Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  McDonald, C. J.
space
  arrow  Dexter, P. R.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

DIABETES CARE AND HEALTH SYSTEMS

The Promise of Computerized Feedback Systems for Diabetes Care

right arrow Clement J. McDonald, MD; J. Marc Overhage, MD, PhD; William M. Tierney, MD; Gregory R. Abernathy, MD; and Paul R. Dexter, MD

1 January 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 1 Part 2 | Pages 170-174

Feedback control is an important mechanism for reaching a targeted goal.Biologic examples range from achieving the appropriate blood pressure level to glycemia control. Computer-based feedback control systems have many potential applications in medicine. Closed-loop systems directly sense the state of the patient and then deliver an intervention without human action. Closed-loop systems have been used to control postoperative fluid infusion, reduce malignant hypertension to a reasonable range through nitroprusside infusions, and control continuous insulin infusions—in effect, an artificial pancreas. Sensory problems have limited the direct application of closed-loop systems to date; most current medical uses of computer-based feedback control are open loop, where a human is interposed between the suggested intervention and the delivered treatment.

Because many variables important to the management of diabetes are objective, many opportunities exist for open-loop control in diabetes management. Open-loop systems have already been used to suggest insulin dosage adjustments and treatments for hypercholesterolemia and to remind physicians of various interventions to reduce the complications of diabetes mellitus. However, existing applications have only scratched the surface. Many more facets of diabetes management could be standardized and assisted by open-loop control systems if the management rules could be more exactly specified, a task requiring substantial time commitments by diabetologists. Efforts to translate existing knowledge bases into precise guidelines will be helpful, but new primary studies and decision analyses are needed to define the optimal use of some interventions.

Author and Article Information
space

From the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care and the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Note: This article is one of a series of articles comprising an Annals of Internal Medicine supplement entitled "Risks and Benefits of Intensive Management in Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: The Fifth Regenstrief Conference." To view a complete list of the articles included in this supplement, please view its Table of Contents.
Acknowledgments: The work was done at the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care.
Grant Support: In part, by contract N01-LM-4-3510 from the National Library of Medicine and grant R01 HS07719-01 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
Requests for Reprints: Clement J. McDonald, MD, Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, 1001 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. McDonald, Overhage, Tierney, Abernathy, and Dexter: Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, 1001 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. T. Rosenbloom, K.-W. Chiu, D. W. Byrne, D. A. Talbert, E. G. Neilson, and R. A. Miller
Interventions to Regulate Ordering of Serum Magnesium Levels: Report of an Unintended Consequence of Decision Support
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 546 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. T. Rosenbloom, A. J. Geissbuhler, W. D. Dupont, D. A. Giuse, D. A. Talbert, W. M. Tierney, W. D. Plummer, W. W. Stead, and R. A. Miller
Effect of CPOE User Interface Design on User-Initiated Access to Educational and Patient Information during Clinical Care
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 458 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
E. F. Ellerbeck, K. K. Engelman, N. J. Williams, N. Nazir, and S. J. Markello
Variations in Diabetes Care and the Influence of Office Systems
American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2004; 19(1): 12 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. Michael Fitzmaurice, K. Adams, and J. M. Eisenberg
Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care: Medical Informatics Support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2002; 9(2): 144 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
P. C. Tang, M. P. LaRosa, C. Newcomb, and S. M. Gorden
Measuring the Effects of Reminders for Outpatient Influenza Immunizations at the Point of Clinical Opportunity
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 1999; 6(2): 115 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
R. D. Zielstorff
Online Practice Guidelines: Issues, Obstacles, and Future Prospects
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1998; 5(3): 227 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
S. B. Henry, K. Douglas, G. Galzagorry, A. Lahey, and W. L. Holzemer
A Template-based Approach to Support Utilization of Clinical Practice Guidelines Within an Electronic Health Record
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1998; 5(3): 237 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Physicians.