Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    Figures/Tables List  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Hiss, R. G.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

IMPROVEMENTS IN DIABETES CARE: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES

Barriers to Care in Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: The Michigan Experience

Roland G. Hiss, MD

1 January 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 1 Part 2 | Pages 146-148

Objective: To determine the barriers to optimal care at the community level for patients with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).

Design: Comprehensive evaluation of the clinical, psychosocial, and educational status of community-based patients with NIDDM, with subsequent review by local diabetes advisory councils of this status and the care those patients have received. The frequency with which patients visited their physician for diabetes management, received patient education, received diet counseling, and were examined by an ophthalmologist—four services universally recognized to be components of optimal diabetes care—was determined for all patients.

Setting: Eight Michigan communities, four large and four small.

Patients: From 1988 to 1994, 1056 patients with NIDDM (defined by stimulated C-peptide criteria) were studied.

Results: The frequency with which all patients with NIDDM visited their community primary care physician in 1994 was 3.7 times per year (4.6 times for patients taking insulin and 3.2 times for those not taking insulin). Thirty-three percent of all patients with NIDDM (48% of those taking insulin and 24% of those not taking insulin) had received all three other essential services, whereas 15% [6% taking insulin and 20% not taking insulin] had never received any of these services. Factors contributing to this level of care and barriers preventing more intensive management of community-based patients with NIDDM were identified by the diabetes advisory councils as they analyzed data from their own communities. The councils determined that the main barriers to optimal care of community-based patients with NIDDM are that 1) NIDDM is not considered or managed as a serious problem by most physicians and their patients; 2) the genetic basis for and refractory nature of obesity are not generally appreciated; and 3) as a complex, multisystemic chronic illness, diabetes fits poorly in a health care delivery system designed to deal with acute and episodic illnesses.

Conclusion: Most community-based patients with NIDDM are not aggressively managed because of attitudinal, educational, and systemic factors that act as barriers to optimal health care delivery.

Author and Article Information

From the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. For the current author address, see end of text.
Note: This article is one of a series of articles comprising an Annals of Internal Medicine supplement entitled "Risks and Benefits of Intensive Management in Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: The Fifth Regenstrief Conference." To view a complete list of the articles included in this supplement, please view its Table of Contents.
Grant Support: By the National Institutes of Health grant P60-AM-20572.
Requests for Reprints: Roland G. Hiss, MD, G1103 Towsley Center, Box 0201, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Funnell, T. L. Brown, B. P. Childs, L. B. Haas, G. M. Hosey, B. Jensen, M. Maryniuk, M. Peyrot, J. D. Piette, D. Reader, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, January 1, 2008; 31(Supplement_1): S97 - S104. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Funnell, T. L. Brown, B. P. Childs, L. B. Haas, G. M. Hosey, B. Jensen, M. Maryniuk, M. Peyrot, J. D. Piette, D. Reader, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 599 - 614. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Funnell, T. L. Brown, B. P. Childs, L. B. Haas, G. M. Hosey, B. Jensen, M. Maryniuk, M. Peyrot, J. D. Piette, D. Reader, et al. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education Diabetes Care, June 1, 2007; 30(6): 1630 - 1637. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Hiss, B. A. Armbruster, M. L. Gillard, and L. A. McClure Nurse Care Manager Collaboration With Community-Based Physicians Providing Diabetes Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial The Diabetes Educator, May 1, 2007; 33(3): 493 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Simmons, S. Lillis, J. Swan, and J. Haar Discordance in Perceptions of Barriers to Diabetes Care Between Patients and Primary Care and Secondary Care Diabetes Care, March 1, 2007; 30(3): 490 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Venkat Narayan, E. Benjamin, E. W. Gregg, S. L. Norris, and M. M. Engelgau Diabetes Translation Research: Where Are We and Where Do We Want To Be? Ann Intern Med, June 1, 2004; 140(11): 958 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Hayward, T. P. Hofer, E. A. Kerr, and S. L. Krein Quality Improvement Initiatives: Issues in moving from diabetes guidelines to policy Diabetes Care, May 1, 2004; 27(suppl_2): B54 - B60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Moore and J. Showstack Primary Care Medicine in Crisis: Toward Reconstruction and Renewal Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 244 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Rothman and E. H. Wagner Chronic Illness Management: What Is the Role of Primary Care? Ann Intern Med, February 4, 2003; 138(3): 256 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Brown, S. B Harris, S. Webster-Bogaert, S. Wetmore, C. Faulds, and M. Stewart The role of patient, physician and systemic factors in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus Fam. Pract., August 1, 2002; 19(4): 344 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Hiss The Concept of Diabetes Translation: Addressing barriers to widespread adoption of new science into clinical care Diabetes Care, July 1, 2001; 24(7): 1293 - 1296. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Hiss, M. L. Gillard, B. A. Armbruster, and L. A. McClure Comprehensive Evaluation of Community-Based Diabetic Patients: Effect of feedback to patients and their physicians: a randomized controlled trial Diabetes Care, April 1, 2001; 24(4): 690 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. D. Piette, M. Weinberger, F. B. Kraemer, and S. J. McPhee Impact of Automated Calls With Nurse Follow-Up on Diabetes Treatment Outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A randomized controlled trial Diabetes Care, February 1, 2001; 24(2): 202 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. E. Glasgow, R. G. Hiss, R. M. Anderson, N. M. Friedman, R. A. Hayward, D. G. Marrero, C. B. Taylor, and F. Vinicor Report of the Health Care Delivery Work Group: Behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care Diabetes Care, January 1, 2001; 24(1): 124 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. Khunti Use of multiple methods to determine factors affecting quality of care of patients with diabetes Fam. Pract., October 1, 1999; 16(5): 489 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]