Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Colwell, J. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ONGOING AND PROPOSED TRIALS

The Feasibility of Intensive Insulin Management in Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: Implications of the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in NIDDM

right arrow John A. Colwell, MD, PhD

1 January 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 1 Part 2 | Pages 131-135

Objective: To review the results from the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in NIDDM (VACSDM) and to discuss the implications of the results from this feasibility trial.

Design: A randomized clinical trial comprising 153 men with non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who remained hyperglycemic on usual pharmacologic therapy. Patients were randomized into two groups receiving either standard or intensive insulin therapy and were followed for 27 months.

Setting: Five Veterans Affairs medical centers.

Patients: 153 men with NIDDM, aged 40 to 69 years, who had hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of greater than 6.55% while receiving sulfonylurea or insulin therapy.

Intervention: Standard insulin therapy was one or two insulin injections daily. Intensive insulin therapy was done using a stepwise approach: 1) evening intermediate or long-acting insulin; 2) addition of daytime glipizide; 3) insulin twice daily, with no glipizide; and 4) insulin three to four times daily, with no glipizide.

Measurements: Fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels, retinopathy, lipid and urinary albumin levels, cardiovascular events, hypoglycemia, and body mass index.

Results: In the intensive group, the HbA1c level fell 2.07 percentage points; the mean HbA1c level was 7.3% from 6 months onward. The standard group experienced little change. These changes occurred without significant weight gain and with a very low rate of severe hypoglycemia. Sixteen patients (20.5%) in the standard group and 24 patients (32%) in the intensive group had cardiovascular events (P = 0.1).

Conclusions: It is feasible to achieve excellent glycemic control in men with NIDDM in whom standard pharmacologic therapy has failed. The benefit/risk ratio of intensive insulin management in this patient group is not established and has been made the subject of a long-term prospective clinical trial.

Author and Article Information
space

From the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program, Hines, Illinois. For the current author address, see end of text.
Note: This article is one of a series of articles comprising an Annals of Internal Medicine supplement entitled "Risks and Benefits of Intensive Management in Non-Insulin-dependent Diabetes Mellitus: The Fifth Regenstrief Conference." To view a complete list of the articles included in this supplement, please view its Table of Contents.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Carlos Abraira, MD, for his leadership and the VACSDM investigators and staff for their able assistance.
Grant Support: By the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program.
Requests for Reprints: John A. Colwell, MD, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC 29425.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. G. Bretzel, S. Arnolds, J. Medding, and T. Linn
A Direct Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Insulin Aspart, Human Soluble Insulin, and Human Premix Insulin (70/30) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2004; 27(5): 1023 - 1027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. E. DeWitt and I. B. Hirsch
Outpatient Insulin Therapy in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Scientific Review
JAMA, May 7, 2003; 289(17): 2254 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
E. M. Benjamin
Case Study: Glycemic Control in the Elderly: Risks and Benefits
Clin. Diabetes, July 1, 2002; 20(3): 118 - 121.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
I. M. El-Kebbi, D. C. Ziemer, C. B. Cook, C. D. Miller, D. L. Gallina, and L. S. Phillips
Comorbidity and Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Arch Intern Med, May 28, 2001; 161(10): 1295 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. M. Thompson, S. E. Kozak, and S. Sheps
Insulin adjustment by a diabetes nurse educator improves glucose control in insulin-requiring diabetic patients: a randomized trial
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 1999; 161(8): 959 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. M. Haffner
The Importance of Hyperglycemia in the Nonfasting State to the Development of Cardiovascular Disease
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 1998; 19(5): 583 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. E. Pontiroli
Is Insulin the Only Treatment for Obese NIDDM Patients Poorly Controlled By Oral Hypoglycemic Agents?b
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 1998; 83(6): 2215 - 2215.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
B. Gaster and I. B. Hirsch
The Effects of Improved Glycemic Control on Complications in Type 2 Diabetes
Arch Intern Med, January 26, 1998; 158(2): 134 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Physicians.