Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 January 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 1 Part 1 | Pages 56-62
Robust scientific conclusions are too sparse to inform fully most of the choices that physicians must make about tests and treatments.Instead, ad hoc rules of thumb, or "heuristics," must guide them, and many of these are problematic. Physicians extrapolate from the small samples studied by clinical trials to general populations, but they do so inconsistently. Many physicians live by rules that dictate "not treating the numbers," correcting abnormalities slowly, achieving diagnostic certainty, and operating now to avoid "greater" risk in the future. Yet in each case, historical trends or statistical realities suggest either doing the opposite or investing in more discriminating heuristics. The heuristics of medicine should be discussed, criticized, refined, and then taught. More uniform use of explicit and better heuristics could lead to less practice variation and more efficient medical care.
Author and Article Information
From the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, and the Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. For the current author address, see end of text.
PERSPECTIVE
Medical Heuristics: The Silent Adjudicators of Clinical Practice
![]()
Grant Support: By grants HS 07719-013 and HS 08750-02 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; and by grant N01-LM-4-3410 from the National Library of Medicine.
Requests for Reprints: Clement J. McDonald, MD, Regenstrief Institute, 1001 West 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Scott The evolving science of translating research evidence into clinical practice Evid. Based Med., February 1, 2007; 12(1): 4 - 7. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Singh, L A Petersen, and E J Thomas Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation. Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 159 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-Y. Salaun, F. Couturaud, K. Lacut, M. Nonent, C. Gut-Gobert, G. Le Gal, P. Guillo, J. Jouquan, D. Mottier, and C. Leroyer Management of suspected venous thromboembolism: the impact of a multifaceted intervention Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 17(5): 433 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Rosenbloom, K.-W. Chiu, D. W. Byrne, D. A. Talbert, E. G. Neilson, and R. A. Miller Interventions to Regulate Ordering of Serum Magnesium Levels: Report of an Unintended Consequence of Decision Support J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 546 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Graber, N. Franklin, and R. Gordon Diagnostic Error in Internal Medicine Arch Intern Med, July 11, 2005; 165(13): 1493 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Croskerry The theory and practice of clinical decision-making Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(suppl_1): R1 - R1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G Klein Five pitfalls in decisions about diagnosis and prescribing BMJ, April 2, 2005; 330(7494): 781 - 783. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V Birtwhistle, M. S Godwin, M D. Delva, R I. Casson, M. Lam, S. E MacDonald, R. Seguin, and L. Ruhland Randomised equivalence trial comparing three month and six month follow up of patients with hypertension by family practitioners BMJ, January 24, 2004; 328(7433): 204 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Kee, J. Jenkins, S. McIlwaine, C. Patterson, S. Harper, and M. Shields Fast and Frugal Models of Clinical Judgment in Novice and Expert Physicians Med Decis Making, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 293 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Jager and J. L. Severens To the Editor Med Decis Making, July 1, 2000; 20(3): 355 - 356. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. McAlister, A. Laupacis, G. A. Wells, D. L. Sackett, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XIX. Applying Clinical Trial Results; B. Guidelines for Determining Whether a Drug Is Exerting (More Than) a Class Effect JAMA, October 13, 1999; 282(14): 1371 - 1377. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Bloom and H. P. Koo The Circumcision Issue Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 1999; 38(4): 243 - 244. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Solomon, H. Hashimoto, L. Daltroy, and M. H. Liang Techniques to Improve Physicians' Use of Diagnostic Tests: A New Conceptual Framework JAMA, December 16, 1998; 280(23): 2020 - 2027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Tierney Feedback of Performance and Diagnostic Testing: Lessons from Maastricht Med Decis Making, October 1, 1996; 16(4): 418 - 419. [PDF] |
||||