Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Imperiale, T. F.
space
  arrow  McCullough, A. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

A Cost Analysis of Alternative Treatments for Duodenal Ulcer

right arrow Thomas F. Imperiale, MD; Theodore Speroff, PhD; Randall D. Cebul, MD; and Arthur J. McCullough, MD

1 November 1995 | Volume 123 Issue 9 | Pages 665-672

Objective: To compare the costs of alternative strategies for the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Design: A cost comparison using decision analysis.

Methods: A decision model was used to compare the costs per cure of an endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer for three initial treatment strategies: 1) H2-receptor antagonist therapy for 8 weeks, 2) antibiotic therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection plus H2-receptor antagonist therapy, and 3) urease test-based treatment. For symptomatic recurrences, secondary treatment strategies included empiric retreatment with the same or other regimen, and treatment based on repeat endoscopy-guided urease test or biopsy, with an assumption of subsequent cure. The cohort modeled for this analysis consisted of patients at low risk for a malignant ulcer. Probability estimates were derived from published clinical trials, cohort studies, and expert opinion. Side effects from combination therapy with antibiotics and H2-receptor antagonists and resulting costs were included from the perspective of a group practice model health maintenance organization.

Results: For all secondary treatment strategies, initial therapy with antibiotics for H. pylori infection plus an H2-receptor antagonist resulted in the lowest average costs per symptomatic cure when the prevalence or likelihood of H. pylori infection exceeded 66% to 76%; the costs ranged from $284 for secondary (re)treatment with empiric antibiotic and H2-receptor antagonist therapy to $398 for endoscopy-guided secondary treatment. Initial treatment with an H2-receptor antagonist resulted in the highest costs, ranging from $372 for secondary treatment with empiric antibiotic and H2-receptor antagonist therapy to $679 for endoscopy-guided secondary treatment. The results were not sensitive to the rates of duodenal ulcer recurrence after either treatment, to the cost of either treatment, or to prevalence of H. pylori.

Conclusions: This cost analysis indicates that, regardless of the secondary treatment used for ulcer recurrence, initial therapy with antibiotics for H. pylori infection plus an H2-receptor antagonist provides the lowest costs per symptomatic cure. These cost savings and the lower recurrence rates associated with this treatment favor eradication of H. pylori as part of the initial treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Author and Article Information
space

From Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Barbara West and Shirley Lawson for gathering cost information, Vickie Stepka for assistance with the figures, and Linda Gall and Janet Phillips for preparation of the manuscript.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Imperiale, Cebul, and McCullough: MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109. Dr. Speroff: Magic Valley Regional Medical Center, 650 Addison Avenue West, Twin Falls, ID 83301.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. F. Lara, G. Cisneros, M. Gurney, M. Van Ness, D. Jarjoura, B. Moauro, A. Polen, G. Rutecki, and F. Whittier
One-Day Quadruple Therapy Compared With 7-Day Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection
Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2003; 163(17): 2079 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Stopeck
Links Between Helicobacter pylori Infection, Cobalamin Deficiency, and Pernicious Anemia
Arch Intern Med, May 8, 2000; 160(9): 1229 - 1230.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
W. L. Peterson, A. M. Fendrick, D. R. Cave, D. A. Peura, S. M. Garabedian-Ruffalo, and L. Laine
Helicobacter pylori-Related Disease: Guidelines for Testing and Treatment
Arch Intern Med, May 8, 2000; 160(9): 1285 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. J. Pasta, J. L. Taylor, and J. M. Henning
Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Incorporating the Bootstrap: An Example Comparing Treatments for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori
Med Decis Making, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 353 - 363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Sonnenberg, J. S. Schwartz, A. F. Cutler, N. Vakil, B. S. Bloom, and for the Gastrointestinal Utilization Trial Study G
Cost Savings in Duodenal Ulcer Therapy Through Helicobacter pylori Eradication Compared With Conventional Therapies: Results of a Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial
Arch Intern Med, April 27, 1998; 158(8): 852 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Physicians.