Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 October 1995 | Volume 123 Issue 8 | Pages 561-571
Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of didanosine with that of continued zidovudine therapy in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who had received zidovudine for at least 6 months and had CD4 cell counts of 200 to 500 CD4 cells/mm3.
Design: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Setting: 10 Canadian university-affiliated specialty clinics.
Patients: 246 patients were assigned to receive standard doses of either zidovudine or didanosine.
Outcome Measures: The primary clinical end point was the occurrence of a new, previously undiagnosed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining illness or death.
Results: 245 of 246 patients were eligible (118 receiving didanosine and 127 receiving zidovudine). Sixty-six percent were asymptomatic, 30% had AIDS-related complex, and 4% had AIDS. The median baseline CD4 count was 320 cells/mm3. The median previous duration of zidovudine therapy was 471 days. Nine new AIDS-defining illnesses developed during the study; all but one were in the zidovudine group (relative risk, 7.9 [95% CI, 1.0 to 63.3; P = 0.02]). A change to didanosine led to a statistically significant increase in CD4 counts by week 2 that persisted until the end of the study at week 48 (P < equals 0.01). Viral sensitivity studies (done in 102 patients) showed that 28% of the zidovudine group and 21% of the didanosine group had high-level in vitro resistance to zidovudine (50% inhibitory concentration greater than 0.8 µm) at baseline (P = 0.49). Only one patient in the didanosine group developed high-level resistance to zidovudine during the study. In the zidovudine group, the cumulative probability of developing high-level resistance to zidovudine was 59% at 1 year (P = 0.01). Abdominal pain, leukopenia, and neutropenia were more frequent in the zidovudine group, and hyperuricemia was more frequent in the didanosine group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: In clinically stable patients with 200 to 500 CD4 cells/mm3 who had tolerated zidovudine for at least 6 months, a change to didanosine led to a decrease in the rate of disease progression, a sustained increase in CD4 counts, and a decrease in the chances of developing high-level resistance to zidovudine. Both drugs were generally well tolerated.
*For additional members of the Canadian HIV Trials Network Protocol 002 Study Group, see the Appendix.
Author and Article Information
From the Canadian HIV Trials Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Wallingford, Connecticut.
ARTICLE
Didanosine Compared with Continued Zidovudine Therapy for HIV-Infected Patients with 200 to 500 CD4 Cells/mm3: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
![]()
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Sylvie Trottier, MD, Helene Senay, MD, Marie-Claude Level, Nashreen Somani, and Patricia Fulton for their assistance; Deborah Hamann-Trou and Kelly Hsu for secretarial assistance; and the patients and their treating physicians for their cooperation and support.
Grant Support: By Bristol-Myers Squibb, United States, and the Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canada. Drs. Schechter and Wainberg are National Health research scientists; Dr. Montaner is a National Health scholar from the National Health Research Program Canada; and Dr. Raboud is a postdoctoral research fellow of the National Health Research Program Canada.
Requests for Reprints: Julio S.G. Montaner, MD, FRCPC, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 667-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 1Y6.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Montaner and Schechter: Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 667-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver V6Z 1Y6, British Columbia, Canada.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Erali, S. Page, L. G. Reimer, and D. R. Hillyard Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Drug Resistance Testing: a Comparison of Three Sequence-Based Methods J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2001; 39(6): 2157 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Hirsch, F. Brun-Vezinet, R. T. D'Aquila, S. M. Hammer, V. A. Johnson, D. R. Kuritzkes, C. Loveday, J. W. Mellors, B. Clotet, B. Conway, et al. Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Testing in Adult HIV-1 Infection: Recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA Panel JAMA, May 10, 2000; 283(18): 2417 - 2426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Borkow, D. Arion, M. A. Wainberg, and M. A. Parniak The Thiocarboxanilide Nonnucleoside Inhibitor UC781 Restores Antiviral Activity of 3'-Azido-3'-Deoxythymidine (AZT) against AZT-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 1999; 43(2): 259 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Wainberg and G. Friedland Public Health Implications of Antiretroviral Therapy and HIV Drug Resistance JAMA, June 24, 1998; 279(24): 1977 - 1983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ddI vs. Continued AZT: It May Pay to Switch Early AIDS Clinical Care, December 1, 1995; 1995(1201): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
DIDANOSINE VERSUS CONTINUED AZT THERAPY FOR HIV Journal Watch (General), October 20, 1995; 1995(1020): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||