Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    Figures/Tables List  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Kollef, M. H.    Hossin, L.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

ARTICLE

Mechanical Ventilation with or without 7-Day Circuit Changes

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Marin H. Kollef; Steven D. Shapiro; Victoria J. Fraser; Patricia Silver; Denise M. Murphy; Ellen Trovillion; Mona L. Hearns; Rodger D. Richards; Lisa Cracchilo; and Linda Hossin

1 August 1995 | Volume 123 Issue 3 | Pages 168-174

Objective: To determine whether a practice of not routinely changing ventilator circuits in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with an increased incidence of nosocomial pneumonia.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Intensive care units in two university-affiliated teaching hospitals.

Patients: 300 patients admitted to an intensive care unit who required mechanical ventilation for more than 5 days.

Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either no routine ventilator circuit changes or circuit changes every 7 days.

Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Other outcome measures included duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and hospital mortality.

Results: 147 patients were randomly assigned to receive no routine ventilator circuit changes, and 153 patients were randomly assigned to receive circuit changes every 7 days. The two groups were similar at the time of randomization with regard to demographic characteristics, intensive care unit admission diagnoses, and severity of illness. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was seen in 36 patients (24.5%) receiving no routine changes and in 44 patients (28.8%) receiving changes every 7 days (relative risk, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.17]). No statistically significant differences for hospital mortality, intensive care unit mortality, death during mechanical ventilation, death in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, or mortality directly attributed to ventilator-associated pneumonia were found between the two treatment groups (P 0.11). Patients receiving changes every 7 days had 247 circuit changes costing a total of $7410; patients receiving no routine changes had a total of 11 circuit changes costing $330.

Conclusion: The elimination of routine ventilator circuit changes can reduce medical care costs without increasing the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Author and Article Information

From Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes Hospital, and Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri.
Requests for Reprints: Marin H. Kollef, MD, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8052, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Daniel P. Schuster, MD, for his review of the manuscript and Darnetta M. Baker, RRT, for her personal communication.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. G. Masterton, A. Galloway, G. French, M. Street, J. Armstrong, E. Brown, J. Cleverley, P. Dilworth, C. Fry, A. D. Gascoigne, et al. Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: Report of the Working Party on Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2008; 62(1): 5 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Crit. Care Nurse, June 1, 2008; 28(3): 83 - 85. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Omrane, J. Eid, M. M Perreault, H. Yazbeck, D. Berbiche, A. Gursahaney, and Y. Moride Impact of a Protocol for Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2007; 41(9): 1390 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Hilinski and M. L. Stark Memory Aide to Reduce the Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Crit. Care Nurse, October 1, 2006; 26(5): 80 - 79. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Koenig and J. D. Truwit Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 637 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Davis Ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review. J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2006; 21(4): 211 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-C. Lacherade, M. Auburtin, C. Cerf, A. Van de Louw, L. Soufir, Y. Rebufat, S. Rezaiguia, J.-D. Ricard, F. Lellouche, C. Brun-Buisson, et al. Impact of Humidification Systems on Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: A Randomized Multicenter Trial Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2005; 172(10): 1276 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Baxter, J. Allan, J. Bedard, S. Malone-Tucker, S. Slivar, M. Langill, M. Perreault, and O. Jansen Adherence to simple and effective measures reduces the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: [L'observation de mesures simples et efficaces reduit l'incidence de pneumonie associee a la ventilation mecanique] Can J Anesth, May 1, 2005; 52(5): 535 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2005; 171(4): 388 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Dodek, S. Keenan, D. Cook, D. Heyland, M. Jacka, L. Hand, J. Muscedere, D. Foster, N. Mehta, R. Hall, et al. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Ann Intern Med, August 17, 2004; 141(4): 305 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Mehta and M. S. Niederman Nosocomial Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit: Controversies and Dilemmas J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 175 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. R. Collard, S. Saint, and M. A. Matthay Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review Ann Intern Med, March 18, 2003; 138(6): 494 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Chastre and J.-Y. Fagon Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2002; 165(7): 867 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Sole, F. E. Poalillo, J. F. Byers, and J. E. Ludy Bacterial Growth in Secretions and on Suctioning Equipment of Orally Intubated Patients: A Pilot Study Am. J. Crit. Care., March 1, 2002; 11(2): 141 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Shorr and P. G. O'Malley Continuous Subglottic Suctioning for the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia : Potential Economic Implications Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1): 228 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Kollef, N. J. Skubas, and T. M. Sundt A Randomized Clinical Trial of Continuous Aspiration of Subglottic Secretions in Cardiac Surgery Patients Chest, November 1, 1999; 116(5): 1339 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Cook, B. De Jonghe, L. Brochard, and C. Brun-Buisson Influence of Airway Management on Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Evidence From Randomized Trials JAMA, March 11, 1998; 279(10): 781 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. KOLLEF, D. PRENTICE, S. D. SHAPIRO, V. J. FRASER, P. SILVER, E. TROVILLION, P. WEILITZ, B. VON HARZ, and R. ST. JOHN Mechanical Ventilation with or without Daily Changes of In-Line Suction Catheters Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 466 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				NO NEED TO ROUTINELY CHANGE VENTILATOR CIRCUITS Journal Watch (General), August 1, 1995; 1995(801): 2 - 2. [Full Text]