Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
1 December 1995 | Volume 123 Issue 11 | Pages 841-844
Objective: To assess the risk associated with midline catheter use in hospitalized patients.
Design: Prospective, consecutive enrollment.
Setting: A 719-bed university-affiliated hospital.
Patients: Patients were enrolled if they were likely to require at least 7 days of intravascular catheterization while hospitalized.
Measurements: Patients were monitored for adverse reactions. Catheter segment, insertion site, hub, infusate, and blood cultures were assessed.
Results: From February 1993 through June 1994, 251 Landmark midline catheters were inserted in 238 patients. One hundred forty catheter cultures were obtained from 130 patients who remained hospitalized for the duration of catheterization. For these 130 patients, the mean duration of catheterization was 9 days, the incidence of catheter colonization was 5.0 per 1000 catheter days, and the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.8 per 1000 catheter days. During the study period, two severe, unexpected adverse reactions occurred that may have been associated with the use of Landmark midline catheters; no such reactions were associated with the insertion of 58 580 Teflon peripheral catheters (P < 0.00001; exact 95% lower bound of the odds ratio, 68.9). Fifty-three similar reactions associated with Landmark midline catheters, including two deaths, have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration through June 1994.
Conclusion: The risk for midline catheter-related infection is low. However, Landmark midline catheters are associated with life-threatening adverse reactions that are probably attributable to the catheter material itself.
Author and Article Information
From Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island.
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
The Risk of Midline Catheterization in Hospitalized Patients: A Prospective Study
![]()
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the Rhode Island Hospital intravenous nursing team for assistance with data collection; Steven E. Reinert, MS, for assistance with statistical computations; Constantine Gatsonis, PhD, for guidance in the statistical analysis; and Kay Pearson, RN, and Ann Cappalli for help in preparing the manuscript.
Grant Support: Menlo Care, Inc., supplied the first 25 catheters used in the study.
Request for Reprints: Dr. Leonard Mermel, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Mermel: Division of Infectious Diseases, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. P. O'Grady, M. Alexander, E. P. Dellinger, J. L. Gerberding, S. O. Heard, D. G. Maki, H. Masur, R. D. McCormick, L. A. Mermel, M. L. Pearson, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): e51 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C S Haworth, R M. Niven, A J Moorcroft, A Phillips, M E Dodd, and A K Webb Acute anaphylaxis following midline catheterisation in a patient with cystic fibrosis Thorax, August 1, 1999; 54(8): 747 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Okano, T. Satoh, T. Tatewaki, T. Kunieda, S. Fukuyama, N. Miyazaki, and Y. Beppu Pulmonary artery sarcoma diagnosed using intravascular ultrasound images Thorax, August 1, 1999; 54(8): 748 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. N. Gilbert, R. J. Dworkin, S. R. Raber, and J. E. Leggett Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial-Drug Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., September 18, 1997; 337(12): 829 - 839. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||