Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

POSITION PAPER

Beyond MICRA: New Ideas for Liability Reform

right arrow American College of Physicians*

15 March 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 6 | Pages 466-473

The existing medical liability system does not work. It does not deter negligence, provide timely compensation to injured persons, or resolve disputes fairly. Studies show that a large percentage of injured patients are not compensated and that physicians feel vulnerable to a lawsuit whether or not they practice high-quality medicine. The arbitrariness and inefficiency of the system disrupts the physician-patient relationship, increases health care costs, and, in some cases, hurts access to care. As a result, comprehensive changes to the liability system must be made. The American College of Physicians makes the following recommendations.

1. Congress should immediately pass the tort reforms contained in the California Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA), particularly caps on noneconomic damages, as necessary short-term changes to a flawed system.

2. Federal legislation should be enacted that overturns recent court decisions that have relied on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, a federal law that regulates pensions and other benefit plans, to bar plaintiffs from suing their health plan for negligence if the plan's benefits or treatment decisions lead to an injury.

3. Demonstration projects should be created and funded to examine the feasibility of using a set of caps for noneconomic damage awards that are based on the severity of injury suffered and the injured party's age. A set of caps could be seen as fairer to injured persons than flat caps but would still protect physicians from unlimited awards.

4. Demonstration projects should be authorized and funded to test enterprise liability and no-fault systems. These systems could take many forms, including administrative approaches; lists of accelerated compensation events; "early offer of settlement" approaches; and organizational liability for health plans, hospitals, or health systems. Such long-term reforms are consistent with trends in health care delivery and are necessary to promote quality of care, compensate injured persons, and protect physicians.

*This paper was authored by Michael J. Werner, JD, and was developed for the Health and Public Policy Committee: Christine K. Cassel, MD, Chair; Charles E. Harrison Jr., MD, Vice-Chair; Whitney Addington, MD; Philip D. Bertram, MD; Sheldon Greenfield, MD; Angela McLean, MD; Mack V. Traynor, MD; Robert A. Berenson, MD; Nancy E. Gary, MD; L. Julian Haywood, MD; J. Harold Morris Jr., MD; and James Webster Jr., MD. Approved by the Board of Regents on 13 January 1995.

Author and Article Information
space

Requests for Reprints: Michael J. Werner, JD, American College of Physicians, 700 13th Street Northwest, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20005.


Related articles in Annals:

Editorials
No-Fault and Enterprise Liability: The View From Utah
S. Keith Petersen
Annals 1995 122: 462-463. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. C. Schoenbaum and R. R. Bovbjerg
Malpractice Reform Must Include Steps To Prevent Medical Injury
Ann Intern Med, January 6, 2004; 140(1): 51 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
W. M. Sage
Medical Liability And Patient Safety
Health Aff., July 1, 2003; 22(4): 26 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
B. Friedland
Managed Care and the Expanding Scope of Primary Care Physicians'Duties: A Proposal to Redefine Explicitly the Standard of Care
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 1998; 26(2): 100 - 112.
[PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Physicians.