Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    Figures/Tables List  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Blakeley, D. D.    Matchar, D. B.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT

Noninvasive Carotid Artery Testing: A Meta-analytic Review

Dean D. Blakeley; Eugene Z. Oddone; Vic Hasselblad; David L. Simel; and David B. Matchar

1 March 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 5 | Pages 360-367

Purpose: To compare the operating characteristics of six noninvasive tests for carotid artery stenosis.

Data Sources: A structured search was done using MEDLINE, reference lists from selected articles, and bibliographies from neurology textbooks that focused on the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis in humans. The search yielded 568 articles.

Study Selection: Articles were selected if the noninvasive test results they presented used carotid angiography as the reference standard for comparison, if carotid artery occlusion was considered as a separate category, and if contingency tables could be constructed.

Data Extraction: At least two physicians reviewed all selected articles. Items abstracted included patient demographics, study design, sites of patient enrollment, whether the interpretation of test outcomes was blinded, and specific results. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and summary measures of effectiveness for each test were calculated.

Results: Carotid duplex ultrasonography, carotid Doppler ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance angiography have sensitivities between 0.82 and 0.86, specificities at 0.98, and test-effectiveness measures at or exceeding 3.0 when predicting 100% occlusion. For carotid stenosis of 70% or more, these three tests and supraorbital Doppler ultrasonography all have sensitivities of 0.83 to 0.86, specificities of 0.89 to 0.94, test-effectiveness measures approaching 3.0, and composite ROC areas of 0.91 to 0.92. Limiting analysis to studies that enrolled consecutive patients and those in which interpretation of the noninvasive tests was independent of the angiograms did not substantially change our results.

Conclusions: Carotid duplex ultrasonography, carotid Doppler ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance angiography are all similarly successful at predicting 100% carotid artery occlusion and 70% stenosis. Other factors, such as cost, availability, and local experience may influence the decision to use these tests to screen for carotid artery atherosclerosis that may respond to surgery.

Author and Article Information

From Duke University and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Requests for Reprints: David B. Matchar, MD, Center for Health Policy Research and Education, 125 Old Chemistry Building, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Sandra Lougue, RN, Ann Shortliff, RN, and Aileen Ward, RN for their diligent article reviews.
Grant Support: By the Agency for Health Care Policy Research, Contract 282-91-0028. Dr. Oddone is supported by the Veterans Affairs Health Services Career Development Program.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Sassi and M. McKee Do clinicians always maximize patient outcomes? A conjoint analysis of preferences for carotid artery testing J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. R. Bates, C. J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, W. A. Gray, K. Ouriel, E. D. Peterson, K. Rosenfield, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) Vascular Medicine, February 1, 2007; 12(1): 35 - 83. [PDF]

				American Society of Interventional & Therapeutic N, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interve, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, E. R. Bates, J. D. Babb, D. E. Casey Jr, C. U. Cates, G. R. Duckwiler, T. E. Feldman, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid Stenting: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 2, 2007; 49(1): 126 - 170. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.L. Cuffe and P.M. Rothwell Effect of Nonoptimal Imaging on the Relationship Between the Measured Degree of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Risk of Ischemic Stroke Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1785 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P Collins, I McKay, S Rajagoplan, P Bachoo, O Robb, and J Brittenden Is carotid duplex scanning sufficient as the sole investigation prior to carotid endarterectomy? Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2005; 78(935): 1034 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Heiserman Measurement Error of Percent Diameter Carotid Stenosis Determined by Conventional Angiography: Implications for Noninvasive Evaluation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2102 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Alberts, R. E. Latchaw, W. R. Selman, T. Shephard, M. N. Hadley, L. M. Brass, W. Koroshetz, J. R. Marler, J. Booss, R. D. Zorowitz, et al. Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers: A Consensus Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1597 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Buskens, P. J. Nederkoorn, T. Buijs-van der Woude, W. P. T. M. Mali, L. J. Kappelle, B. C. Eikelboom, Y. van der Graaf, and M. G. Myriam Hunink Imaging of Carotid Arteries in Symptomatic Patients: Cost-effectiveness of Diagnostic Strategies Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 101 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Fenton and R. A. Deyo Patient Self-Referral for Radiologic Screening Tests: Clinical and Ethical Concerns J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2003; 16(6): 494 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Rothwell For Severe Carotid Stenosis Found on Ultrasound, Further Arterial Evaluation Prior to Carotid Endarterectomy Is Unnecessary: The Argument Against Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1817 - 1819. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Coste and J. Pouchot A grey zone for quantitative diagnostic and screening tests Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2003; 32(2): 304 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, A. van der Lugt, L. W. Bartels, and W. P.T.M. Mali Time-of-Flight MR Angiography of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Does a Flow Void Represent Severe Stenosis? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2002; 23(10): 1779 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, W. P.Th.M. Mali, B. C. Eikelboom, O. E.H. Elgersma, E. Buskens, M.G. M. Hunink, L. J. Kappelle, P. C. Buijs, A. F.J. Wust, A. van der Lugt, et al. Preoperative Diagnosis of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Noninvasive Testing Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 2003 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S G Patel, D A Collie, J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, A R Wright, R J Gibson, and R J Sellar Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2002; 73(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K-T Khaw and P D Griffiths Non-invasive imaging of the cervical carotid and vertebral arteries Imaging, December 15, 2001; 13(5): 376 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. H. Humphries, I. C.D. Westendorp, M. L. Bots, J. J. Spinelli, R. G. Carere, A. Hofman, and J. C.M. Witteman Parity and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis in Elderly Women: The Rotterdam Study Stroke, October 1, 2001; 32(10): 2259 - 2264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, P Humphrey, G Young, D Collie, and C P Warlow How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2001; 71(2): 155 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Norris and P. M. Rothwell Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy: Is it really safer than conventional angiography? Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 990 - 991. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Brott and J. Bogousslavsky Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke N. Engl. J. Med., September 7, 2000; 343(10): 710 - 722. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Rothwell, S. T. Pendlebury, J. Wardlaw, and C. P. Warlow Critical Appraisal of the Design and Reporting of Studies of Imaging and Measurement of Carotid Stenosis Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1444 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Furst, A. Saleh, F. Wenserski, J. Malms, M. Cohnen, A. Aulich, T. Neumann-Haefelin, M. Schroeter, H. Steinmetz, and M. Sitzer Reliability and Validity of Noninvasive Imaging of Internal Carotid Artery Pseudo-Occlusion Stroke, July 1, 1999; 30(7): 1444 - 1449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Hankey Stroke: How Large a Public Health Problem, and How Can the Neurologist Help? Arch Neurol, June 1, 1999; 56(6): 748 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Kallikazaros, C. Tsioufis, S. Sideris, C. Stefanadis, and P. Toutouzas Carotid Artery Disease as a Marker for the Presence of Severe Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Evaluated for Chest Pain Stroke, May 1, 1999; 30(5): 1002 - 1007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Ranke, A. Creutzig, H. Becker, and H.-J. Trappe Standardization of Carotid Ultrasound : A Hemodynamic Method to Normalize for Interindividual and Interequipment Variability Stroke, February 1, 1999; 30(2): 402 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A. Bastian, K. Nanda, V. Hasselblad, and D. L. Simel Diagnostic Efficiency of Home Pregnancy Test Kits: A Meta-analysis Arch Fam Med, September 1, 1998; 7(5): 465 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C J M Whitty, C L M Sudlow, and C P Warlow Investigating individual subjects and screening populations for asymptomatic carotid stenosis can be harmful J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 1998; 64(5): 619 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. G. Holloway Jr, D. M. Witter Jr, A. I. Mushlin, K. B. Lawton, M. P. McDermott, and G. P. Samsa Carotid Endarterectomy Trends in the Patterns and Outcomes of Care at Academic Medical Centers, 1990 Through 1995 Arch Neurol, January 1, 1998; 55(1): 25 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Heden, H. Ohlin, R. Rittner, and L. Edenbrandt Acute Myocardial Infarction Detected in the 12-Lead ECG by Artificial Neural Networks Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1798 - 1802. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N. A. Obuchowski, M. T. Modic, M. Magdinec, and T. J. Masaryk Assessment of the Efficacy of Noninvasive Screening for Patients With Asymptomatic Neck Bruits Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1330 - 1339. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Culebras, C. S. Kase, J. C. Masdeu, A. J. Fox, R. N. Bryan, C. B. Grossman, D. H. Lee, H. P. Adams, W. Thies, and E. O. Members Practice Guidelines for the Use of Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attacks and Acute Stroke : A Report of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1480 - 1497. [Full Text]

				J. H. Wong, J. M. Findlay, and M. E. Suarez-Almazor Regional Performance of Carotid Endarterectomy : Appropriateness, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications Stroke, May 1, 1997; 28(5): 891 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. M. Zwolak Carotid Endarterectomy Without Angiography: Are We Ready? Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 1997; 31(1): 1 - 9. [PDF]

				G. Howard, W. H. Baker, L. E. Chambless, V. J. Howard, A. M. Jones, and J. F. Toole An Approach for the Use of Doppler Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Hemodynamically Significant Stenosis (Despite Heterogeneity of Doppler Performance): A Multicenter Experience Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 1951 - 1957. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. L. Wilterdink, E. Feldmann, J. D. Easton, and R. Ward Performance of Carotid Ultrasound in Evaluating Candidates for Carotid Endarterectomy Is Optimized by an Approach Based on Clinical Outcome Rather Than Accuracy Stroke, June 1, 1996; 27(6): 1094 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text]