Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Localio, A. R.
space
  arrow  Landis, J. R.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ACADEMIA AND CLINIC

Comparing Hospital Mortality in Adult Patients with Pneumonia: A Case Study of Statistical Methods in a Managed Care Program

right arrow A. Russell Localio; Bruce H. Hamory; Tonya J. Sharp; Susan L. Weaver; Thomas R. TenHave; and J. Richard Landis

15 January 1995 | Volume 122 Issue 2 | Pages 125-132

Objective: To compare and contrast a managed care program's analysis of differences in hospital mortality with results obtained by accepted statistical methods.

Design: A re-analysis of computerized discharge data using the same method used by a managed care program, and using conventional methods of categorical data analysis. One thousand computer simulations of a method for comparing hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality were done to determine the probability of falsely identifying hospitals as high-mortality outliers.

Setting: 22 acute care hospitals in central Pennsylvania.

Patients: All adult patients with pneumonia (n = 4587; diagnosis-related groups 089-090) less than 65 years of age who were discharged from the 22 hospitals in 1989, 1990, and 1991, excluding patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and transplant recipients.

Measurements: In-hospital mortality adjusted for age and severity of illness using MedisGroups admission severity group score.

Results: The hospital that had the highest mortality for adult pneumonia according to the managed care program's analysis did not, according to an appropriate analysis, differ significantly from other area hospitals (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.23). Random variation in this sample of patients with a low average mortality rate (3.5%) showed a 60% chance that 1 or more of the 22 hospitals would be falsely identified as a "high-mortality outlier" when simplistic statistical methods were used.

Conclusion: Organizations seeking to compare the quality of hospitals and physicians through outcome data need to recognize that simplistic methods applicable to large samples fail when applied to the outcomes of typical patients, such as those admitted for pneumonia. Although these comparisons are much in demand, careful attention must be paid to their statistical methods to ensure validity and fairness.

Author and Article Information
space

From Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Requests for Reprints: A. Russell Localio, Penn State University College of Medicine, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Allan C. Anderson, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at Hershey Medical Center, for his support of this project.


Related articles in Annals:

Editorials
The Measure and Mismeasure of Hospital Quality: Appropriate Risk-Adjustment Methods in Comparing Hospitals
Albert W. Wu
Annals 1995 122: 149-150. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
B. Mozes, Y. Maor, L. Olmer, and E. Shabtai
Comparing Medical Centers Treating Hip Fractures in the Elderly: The Importance of Multi-Outcome Measurements
American Journal of Medical Quality, May 1, 1999; 14(3): 117 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
G. E. Rosenthal, M.-M. Chren, R. J. Lasek, and C. S. Landefeld
What Patients Should Ask of Consumers' Guides to Health Care Quality
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1998; 21(3): 316 - 331.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
A. G. Mainous III and J. Talbert
Assessing Quality of Care via HEDIS 3.0: Is There a Better Way?
Arch Fam Med, September 1, 1998; 7(5): 410 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1995 by the American College of Physicians.