Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 November 1994 | Volume 121 Issue 10 | Pages 750-756
Objective: To derive and validate a clinical prediction rule that identifies patients after myocardial infarction who have preserved left ventricular systolic function.
Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study, with a derivation set to generate a clinical prediction rule and a validation set to test the prediction rule.
Setting: Urban tertiary care hospital.
Patients: 314 consecutive patients admitted with myocardial infarction who had one or more of the following tests to determine left ventricular ejection fraction: transthoracic echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, or radionuclide ventriculography.
Measurements: Left ventricular ejection fractions were determined by transthoracic echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, and gated blood pool scan.
Results: Multivariate analysis of patients in the derivation set yielded the following rule: The left ventricular ejection fraction is predicted to be 40% or more in patients who have 1) an interpretable electrocardiogram, 2) no previous Q-wave myocardial infraction, 3) no history of congestive heart failure, and 4) an index myocardial infarction that is not a Q-wave anterior infarction. In the derivation and the validation sets, the positive predictive value of the prediction rule was more than 0.98.
Conclusions: A simple clinical prediction rule using easily obtained historical and electrocardiographic data reliably identifies a substantial percentage of patients after myocardial infarction (40% in our hospital) who are likely to have preserved left ventricular systolic function. If validated in other patient populations, application of this prediction rule in clinical practice could result in a substantial decrease in the cost of treating uncomplicated myocardial infarction.
Author and Article Information
From Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
ARTICLE
A Clinical Rule To Predict Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients after Myocardial Infarction
![]()
Requests for Reprints: Patrick T. O'Gara, MD, Cardiac Unit, Ambulatory Care Center 475, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA 02114.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Ms. Shirley Thomas and Dr. Michael Picard for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Douketis Use of a Clinical Prediction Score in Patients with Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back? Ann Intern Med, July 19, 2005; 143(2): 140 - 142. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lopez-Jimenez, T. Y. Goraya, J. P. Hellermann, S. J. Jacobsen, G. S. Reeder, S. A. Weston, and V. L. Roger Measurement of Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction in the Population Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 397 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. McGinn, G. H. Guyatt, P. C. Wyer, C. D. Naylor, I. G. Stiell, W. S. Richardson, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXII: How to Use Articles About Clinical Decision Rules JAMA, July 5, 2000; 284(1): 79 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. W. Nielsen, J. F. Hansen, J. Hilden, C. T. Larsen, and J. Svanegaard Risk assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care: cross sectional study evaluating a range of diagnostic tests BMJ, January 22, 2000; 320(7229): 220 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tobin, R. Stomel, D. Harber, D. Karavite, J. Sievers, and K. Eagle Validation in a Community Hospital Setting of a Clinical Rule to Predict Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, February 22, 1999; 159(4): 353 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, E. D. Peterson, L. K. Shaw, K. L. Kesler, E. R. DeLong, F. E. Harrell Jr, L. H. Muhlbaier, and D. B. Mark Use of a Prognostic Treadmill Score in Identifying Diagnostic Coronary Disease Subgroups Circulation, October 20, 1998; 98(16): 1622 - 1630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Predicting Post-MI Ejection Fraction Clinically Journal Watch Cardiology, January 1, 1995; 1995(101): 17 - 17. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
PREDICTING POST-MI EJECTION FRACTION CLINICALLY Journal Watch (General), December 2, 1994; 1994(1202): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||