Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Silver, M. T.
space
  arrow  Eagle, K. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

A Clinical Rule To Predict Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients after Myocardial Infarction

right arrow Marc T. Silver; Geoffrey A. Rose; Sumita D. Paul; Christopher J. O'Donnell; Patrick T. O'Gara; and Kim A. Eagle

15 November 1994 | Volume 121 Issue 10 | Pages 750-756

Objective: To derive and validate a clinical prediction rule that identifies patients after myocardial infarction who have preserved left ventricular systolic function.

Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study, with a derivation set to generate a clinical prediction rule and a validation set to test the prediction rule.

Setting: Urban tertiary care hospital.

Patients: 314 consecutive patients admitted with myocardial infarction who had one or more of the following tests to determine left ventricular ejection fraction: transthoracic echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, or radionuclide ventriculography.

Measurements: Left ventricular ejection fractions were determined by transthoracic echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, and gated blood pool scan.

Results: Multivariate analysis of patients in the derivation set yielded the following rule: The left ventricular ejection fraction is predicted to be 40% or more in patients who have 1) an interpretable electrocardiogram, 2) no previous Q-wave myocardial infraction, 3) no history of congestive heart failure, and 4) an index myocardial infarction that is not a Q-wave anterior infarction. In the derivation and the validation sets, the positive predictive value of the prediction rule was more than 0.98.

Conclusions: A simple clinical prediction rule using easily obtained historical and electrocardiographic data reliably identifies a substantial percentage of patients after myocardial infarction (40% in our hospital) who are likely to have preserved left ventricular systolic function. If validated in other patient populations, application of this prediction rule in clinical practice could result in a substantial decrease in the cost of treating uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Author and Article Information
space

From Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Requests for Reprints: Patrick T. O'Gara, MD, Cardiac Unit, Ambulatory Care Center 475, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA 02114.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Ms. Shirley Thomas and Dr. Michael Picard for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. D. Douketis
Use of a Clinical Prediction Score in Patients with Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back?
Ann Intern Med, July 19, 2005; 143(2): 140 - 142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
F. Lopez-Jimenez, T. Y. Goraya, J. P. Hellermann, S. J. Jacobsen, G. S. Reeder, S. A. Weston, and V. L. Roger
Measurement of Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction in the Population
Chest, February 1, 2004; 125(2): 397 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. G. McGinn, G. H. Guyatt, P. C. Wyer, C. D. Naylor, I. G. Stiell, W. S. Richardson, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XXII: How to Use Articles About Clinical Decision Rules
JAMA, July 5, 2000; 284(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
O. W. Nielsen, J. F. Hansen, J. Hilden, C. T. Larsen, and J. Svanegaard
Risk assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in primary care: cross sectional study evaluating a range of diagnostic tests
BMJ, January 22, 2000; 320(7229): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Tobin, R. Stomel, D. Harber, D. Karavite, J. Sievers, and K. Eagle
Validation in a Community Hospital Setting of a Clinical Rule to Predict Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients After Myocardial Infarction
Arch Intern Med, February 22, 1999; 159(4): 353 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. J. Shaw, E. D. Peterson, L. K. Shaw, K. L. Kesler, E. R. DeLong, F. E. Harrell Jr, L. H. Muhlbaier, and D. B. Mark
Use of a Prognostic Treadmill Score in Identifying Diagnostic Coronary Disease Subgroups
Circulation, October 20, 1998; 98(16): 1622 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Predicting Post-MI Ejection Fraction Clinically
Journal Watch Cardiology, January 1, 1995; 1995(101): 17 - 17.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
PREDICTING POST-MI EJECTION FRACTION CLINICALLY
Journal Watch (General), December 2, 1994; 1994(1202): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Physicians.