Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

POSITION PAPER

The Oversight of Medical Care: A Proposal for Reform

right arrow American College of Physicians*

1 March 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 5 | Pages 423-431

The oversight of medical care, in the form of peer review, has traditionally been used to ensure that the highest standards of care are maintained. What is relatively new is the external oversight of medical practice carried out by a growing number of independent entities (government, third-party payers, for-profit firms, for example), overseeing care in uncoordinated ways. Tensions arise when reviews of utilization and reviews of quality are conducted by different organizations with conflicting goals. The review instruments are still crude and have neither been adequately tested nor validated. Future attention to developing reliable and valid measures of efficiency and quality is essential. Evidence suggests that the principal process of review, the case-by-case review, may not be cost-effective and may not be conducive to improving quality. It should be replaced by profiles of practice patterns at institutional, regional, or national levels. We propose a model of oversight that emphasizes the appropriate balance between internal mechanisms of quality improvement and external accountability. In this model, internal and external reviews have specific, complementary roles that promote efficiency and quality. Detailed monitoring of quality and problem solving are left to providers who are intimately involved with care. In return, they become accountable to payers and the public through the surveillance of patterns of practice.

*This paper, authored by Anne-Marie Audet, MD, MSc, SM, and H. Denman Scott, MD, MPH, was developed for the Health and Public Policy Committee: Clifton R. Cleveland, MD, Chair; Cecil O. Samuelson, MD, Vice-Chair; Christine K. Cassel, MD; David J. Gullen, MD; Ernest L. Mazzaferri, MD; Quentin D. Young, MD; Whitney Addington, MD; Robert A. Berenson, MD; John M. Eisenberg, MD; Nancy E. Gary, MD; P. Preston Reynolds, MD; Gerald E. Thomson, MD; Mack V. Traynor, Jr., MD; Sankey V. Williams, MD. Approved by the Board of Regents on 29 March 1993.

Author and Article Information
space

Requests for Reprints: Linda Johnson White, Director, American College of Physicians, Independence Mall West, Sixth Street at Race, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
V. A. Ferraris, F. H. Edwards, D. M. Shahian, and S. P. Ferraris
Risk Stratification and Comorbidity
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 199 - 246.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
V. A. Ferraris and S. P. Ferraris
Risk Stratification and Comorbidity
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 187 - 224.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. A. Balas, S. Weingarten, C. T. Garb, D. Blumenthal, S. A. Boren, and G. D. Brown
Improving Preventive Care by Prompting Physicians
Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2000; 160(3): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
D. P. Olsen
Provider Choice: Essential To Autonomy or Advertising Gimmick?
Nursing Ethics, June 1, 1996; 3(2): 108 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. F. Shapiro and N. S. Wenger
Rethinking Utilization Review
N. Engl. J. Med., November 16, 1995; 333(20): 1353 - 1354.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. B. Soumerai and H. L. Lipton
Computer-Based Drug-Utilization Review -- Risk, Benefit, or Boondoggle?
N. Engl. J. Med., June 15, 1995; 332(24): 1641 - 1645.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Physicians.