Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Menichetti, F.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Preventing Fungal Infection in Neutropenic Patients with Acute Leukemia: Fluconazole Compared with Oral Amphotericin B

right arrow Francesco Menichetti; Albano Del Favero; Piero Martino; Giampaolo Bucaneve; Alessandra Micozzi; Domenico D'Antonio; Paolo Ricci; Mario Carotenuto; Vincenzo Liso; Anna Maria Nosari; Tiziano Barbui; Giampiero Fasola; Franco Mandelli, The GIMEMA Infection Program*

1 June 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 11 | Pages 913-918

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fluconazole and oral amphotericin B in preventing fungal infection in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia.

Design: A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.

Setting: 30 hematologic units in tertiary care or university hospitals.

Patients: 820 consecutive, afebrile, adult patients with acute leukemia and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive fluconazole, 150 mg, as a once-daily capsule, or amphotericin B suspension, 500 mg every 6 hours.

Measurements: An intention-to-treat analysis was done for 820 patients: 420 treated with fluconazole and 400 treated with oral amphotericin B.

Results: Definite systemic fungal infection occurred in 2.6% of fluconazole recipients and 2.5% of amphotericin B recipients; suspected systemic fungal infection requiring the empiric use of intravenous amphotericin B occurred in 16% of fluconazole recipients and 21% of oral amphotericin B recipients, a difference of 5 percentage points (95% CI for difference, –0.02% to 10%; P = 0.07). Superficial fungal infection was documented in 1.7% of fluconazole recipients compared with 2.7% of amphotericin B recipients, a difference of one percentage point (CI of difference, –0.9% to 3%; P > 0.2). The distribution of fungal isolates in systemic and superficial fungal infection was similar in both groups. The overall mortality rate accounted for 10% in both groups. An excellent compliance was documented for 90% of patients treated with fluconazole compared with 72% of those treated with amphotericin B suspension, a difference of 18 percentage points (CI for difference, 13% to 23%). Side effects were documented less frequently in fluconazole than in amphotericin B recipients (1.4% compared with 7%, a difference of 5.6 percentage points; CI for difference, 2% to 8%; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Fluconazole was at least as effective as oral amphotericin B in preventing systemic and superficial fungal infection and the empiric use of amphotericin B in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia but was better tolerated.

*Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto. See Appendix for additional investigators in the study and end of text for participating institutions and current author addresses.

Author and Article Information
space

From Istituto di Malattie Infettive and Istituto di Clinica Medica 1, Universita di Perugia; Istituto di Ematologia, Universita "La Sapienza" Roma; Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale Pescara; Istituto di Ematologia, Universita di Bologna; Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale S. Giovanni Rotondo; Istituto di Ematologia, Universita di Bari; Divisione Talamona, Ospedale Niguarda, Milano; Divisione di Ematologia, Ospedale di Bergamo; Cattedra di Ematologia, Ospedale di Udine.
Requests for Reprints: Francesco Menichetti, MD, Istituto di Malattie Infettive, Universita di Perugia, Ospedale Policlinico Monteluce, 06122 Perugia, Italy.
Grant Support: By grants from Pfizer, Italy; and by contract N. 92.02177.39/115.19159 with Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
haematolHome page
F. Dalle, I. Lafon, C. L'Ollivier, E. Ferrant, P. Sicard, C. Labruere, A. Jebrane, A. Laubriet, O. Vagner, D. Caillot, et al.
A prospective analysis of the genotypic diversity and dynamics of the Candida albicans colonizing flora in neutropenic patients with de novo acute leukemia
Haematologica, April 1, 2008; 93(4): 581 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Robenshtok, A. Gafter-Gvili, E. Goldberg, M. Weinberger, M. Yeshurun, L. Leibovici, and M. Paul
Antifungal Prophylaxis in Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5471 - 5489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Charlier, E. Hart, A. Lefort, P. Ribaud, F. Dromer, D. W. Denning, and O. Lortholary
Fluconazole for the management of invasive candidiasis: where do we stand after 15 years?
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2006; 57(3): 384 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
O. A. Cornely, A. J. Ullmann, and M. Karthaus
Evidence-based assessment of primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies
Blood, May 1, 2003; 101(9): 3365 - 3372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Girmenia, L. Pagano, G. Leone, P. Martino, G. P. Bodey, H. A. Hanna, and I. I. Raad
Fluconazole and Candida krusei Fungemia
Arch Intern Med, October 8, 2001; 161(18): 2267 - 2269.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
C. Girmenia, C. Tuccinardi, S. Santilli, F. Mondello, M. Monaco, A. Cassone, and P. Martino
In vitro activity of fluconazole and voriconazole against isolates of Candida albicans from patients with haematological malignancies
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., September 1, 2000; 46(3): 479 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. L. Harousseau, A. W. Dekker, A. Stamatoullas-Bastard, A. Fassas, W. Linkesch, J. Gouveia, R. De Bock, M. Rovira, W. F. Seifert, H. Joosen, et al.
Itraconazole Oral Solution for Primary Prophylaxis of Fungal Infections in Patients with Hematological Malignancy and Profound Neutropenia: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Placebo, Multicenter Trial Comparing Itraconazole and Amphotericin B
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2000; 44(7): 1887 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. K. Johansen and P. C. Gotzsche
Problems in the Design and Reporting of Trials of Antifungal Agents Encountered During Meta-analysis
JAMA, November 10, 1999; 282(18): 1752 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Physicians.