Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Kent, D. L.
space
  arrow  Larson, E. B.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REVIEW

The Clinical Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neuroimaging

right arrow Daniel L. Kent; David R. Haynor; W. T. Longstreth; and Eric B. Larson

15 May 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 10 | Pages 856-871

Purpose: To assess the clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for neuroimaging and to provide guidelines for clinical practice.

Study Selection: After a comprehensive literature search, studies of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI alone or compared with other tests and of any impact on therapeutic choices or patient outcomes were reviewed by independent readers, followed by discussion to reach consensus conclusions.

Data Extraction: Of 3125 citations retrieved, 156 studies with original data could be rated according to methodologic criteria for study design. One article contributed grade A quality information about diagnostic accuracy, 28 were graded B or C, and 113 were graded D. One randomized trial and 2 comparison studies contributed grade B or C information about the impact on therapeutic choices. Only 2 studies surveyed health status before and after magnetic resonance scanning.

Results: For most abnormalities, the sensitivity of MRI is equal to or better than competing technologies. Magnetic resonance imaging shows greater contrast and detail than computed tomography (CT) but also shows more clinically silent abnormalities or incidental findings. A few studies found a modest impact on therapeutic choices but no impact on quality of life or disability. Costs for MRI are high. Computed tomography is sufficient for initial diagnosis of most mass lesions or intracranial hemorrhages requiring immediate intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging is more accurate in the temporal lobes, posterior fossa, brainstem, and spinal cord. For lumbar radiculopathy, MRI and plain spinal CT are as accurate as postmyelographic CT and are less invasive. The role of magnetic resonance angiography for carotid artery stenosis is being studied.

Conclusions: Although suggestions for appropriate use of MRI in clinical practice can be made, the supporting evidence in published studies is weak. Firm guidelines for appropriate use of MRI should be based on further clinical research using more rigorous methods.

Author and Article Information
space

From the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Requests For Reprints: Linda Johnson White, Director, Department of Scientific Policy, American College of Physicians, Independence Mall West, Sixth Street at Race, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Laura Larsson and Yuki Durham for literature searches, article copying and circulation, and all aspects of managing the databases.
Grant Support: In part by the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, by the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Program of the American College of Physicians, and by grant HS-06344 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.J. Seidenwurm and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging
Myelopathy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1032 - 1034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
R. Prabhakar, P. K. Julka, T. Ganesh, A. Munshi, R. C. Joshi, and G. K. Rath
Feasibility of using MRI alone for 3D Radiation Treatment Planning in Brain Tumors
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 16, 2007; (2007) hym050v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
S. M Kymes, K. Lee, J. W Fletcher, and SNAP (CSP 027) Study Group
Assessing diagnostic accuracy and the clinical value of positron emission tomography imaging in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SNAP)
Clinical Trials, February 1, 2006; 3(1): 31 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. O. Heidenreich, R. Stendel, M. Brock, K.-J. Wolf, and A. M. Schilling
Evaluation of MR Imaging Compatibility of a New Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Device
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2005; 26(2): 360 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. H. Sunshine and K. E. Applegate
Technology Assessment for Radiologists
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 309 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. N. Babu, S. M. Kymes, and S. M. Carpenter Fryer
Eponyms and the Diagnosis of Aortic Regurgitation: What Says the Evidence?
Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 736 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. G.W. Fraser, A. R. Moody, P. S. Morgan, A. L. Martel, and I. Davidson
Diagnosis of Lower-Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Prospective Blinded Study of Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging
Ann Intern Med, January 15, 2002; 136(2): 89 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Karlik
How to Develop and Critique a Research Protocol
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1375 - 1380.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. C. Blackmore
The Challenge of Clinical Radiology Research
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 327 - 331.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. R. Gifford, R. G. Holloway, and B. G. Vickrey
Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules for Neuroimaging in the Evaluation of Dementia
Arch Intern Med, October 9, 2000; 160(18): 2855 - 2862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Arrivé, R. Renard, F. Carrat, A. Belkacem, H. Dahan, P. Le Hir, L. Monnier-Cholley, and J.-M. Tubiana
A Scale of Methodological Quality for Clinical Studies of Radiologic Examinations
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 69 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. S. Medina
Study Design and Analysis in Neuroradiology: A Practical Approach
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 1999; 20(9): 1584 - 1596.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. T. Bogardus Jr, J. Concato, and A. R. Feinstein
Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research: The Need for Methodological Standards
JAMA, May 26, 1999; 281(20): 1919 - 1926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Breslau, J. G. Jarvik, D. R. Haynor, W. T. Longstreth Jr, D. L. Kent, and K. R. Maravilla
MR Contrast Media in Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of the Literature
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 670 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. Dagher and L. Helman
Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Overview
Oncologist, February 1, 1999; 4(1): 34 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
LupusHome page
D. Mevorach and K. Elkon
Neuropsychiatric lupus: getting beyond the barrier of the brain
Lupus, June 1, 1996; 5(3): 173 - 174.
[PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1994 by the American College of Physicians.