 |
 |
|
|
|  PubMed
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 May 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 10 | Pages 856-871
Purpose: To assess the clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for neuroimaging and to provide guidelines for clinical practice.
Study Selection: After a comprehensive literature search, studies of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI alone or compared with other tests and of any impact on therapeutic choices or patient outcomes were reviewed by independent readers, followed by discussion to reach consensus conclusions.
Data Extraction: Of 3125 citations retrieved, 156 studies with original data could be rated according to methodologic criteria for study design. One article contributed grade A quality information about diagnostic accuracy, 28 were graded B or C, and 113 were graded D. One randomized trial and 2 comparison studies contributed grade B or C information about the impact on therapeutic choices. Only 2 studies surveyed health status before and after magnetic resonance scanning.
Results: For most abnormalities, the sensitivity of MRI is equal to or better than competing technologies. Magnetic resonance imaging shows greater contrast and detail than computed tomography (CT) but also shows more clinically silent abnormalities or incidental findings. A few studies found a modest impact on therapeutic choices but no impact on quality of life or disability. Costs for MRI are high. Computed tomography is sufficient for initial diagnosis of most mass lesions or intracranial hemorrhages requiring immediate intervention. Magnetic resonance imaging is more accurate in the temporal lobes, posterior fossa, brainstem, and spinal cord. For lumbar radiculopathy, MRI and plain spinal CT are as accurate as postmyelographic CT and are less invasive. The role of magnetic resonance angiography for carotid artery stenosis is being studied.
Conclusions: Although suggestions for appropriate use of MRI in clinical practice can be made, the supporting evidence in published studies is weak. Firm guidelines for appropriate use of MRI should be based on further clinical research using more rigorous methods.
Author and Article Information
From the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
REVIEW
The Clinical Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neuroimaging
Requests For Reprints: Linda Johnson White, Director, Department of Scientific Policy, American College of Physicians, Independence Mall West, Sixth Street at Race, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Laura Larsson and Yuki Durham for literature searches, article copying and circulation, and all aspects of managing the databases.
Grant Support: In part by the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, by the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Program of the American College of Physicians, and by grant HS-06344 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D.J. Seidenwurm and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging Myelopathy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1032 - 1034. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. A. Stanton, Y.-H. Hsieh, C. A. Camargo Jr, J. A. Edlow, P. Lovett, J. N. Goldstein, S. Abbuhl, M. Lin, A. Chanmugam, R. E. Rothman, et al. Overreliance on Symptom Quality in Diagnosing Dizziness: Results of a Multicenter Survey of Emergency Physicians Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2007; 82(11): 1319 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Prabhakar, P. K. Julka, T. Ganesh, A. Munshi, R. C. Joshi, and G. K. Rath Feasibility of using MRI alone for 3D Radiation Treatment Planning in Brain Tumors Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 16, 2007; (2007) hym050v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M Kymes, K. Lee, J. W Fletcher, and SNAP (CSP 027) Study Group Assessing diagnostic accuracy and the clinical value of positron emission tomography imaging in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SNAP) Clinical Trials, February 1, 2006; 3(1): 31 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. O. Heidenreich, R. Stendel, M. Brock, K.-J. Wolf, and A. M. Schilling Evaluation of MR Imaging Compatibility of a New Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Device AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2005; 26(2): 360 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Sunshine and K. E. Applegate Technology Assessment for Radiologists Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 309 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. N. Babu, S. M. Kymes, and S. M. Carpenter Fryer Eponyms and the Diagnosis of Aortic Regurgitation: What Says the Evidence? Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 736 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G.W. Fraser, A. R. Moody, P. S. Morgan, A. L. Martel, and I. Davidson Diagnosis of Lower-Limb Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Prospective Blinded Study of Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging Ann Intern Med, January 15, 2002; 136(2): 89 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J. Karlik How to Develop and Critique a Research Protocol Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1375 - 1380. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. C. Blackmore The Challenge of Clinical Radiology Research Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 327 - 331. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. R. Gifford, R. G. Holloway, and B. G. Vickrey Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Rules for Neuroimaging in the Evaluation of Dementia Arch Intern Med, October 9, 2000; 160(18): 2855 - 2862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Arrivé, R. Renard, F. Carrat, A. Belkacem, H. Dahan, P. Le Hir, L. Monnier-Cholley, and J.-M. Tubiana A Scale of Methodological Quality for Clinical Studies of Radiologic Examinations Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 69 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S. Medina Study Design and Analysis in Neuroradiology: A Practical Approach AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 1999; 20(9): 1584 - 1596. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. T. Bogardus Jr, J. Concato, and A. R. Feinstein Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research: The Need for Methodological Standards JAMA, May 26, 1999; 281(20): 1919 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Breslau, J. G. Jarvik, D. R. Haynor, W. T. Longstreth Jr, D. L. Kent, and K. R. Maravilla MR Contrast Media in Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of the Literature AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 670 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Dagher and L. Helman Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Overview Oncologist, February 1, 1999; 4(1): 34 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Mevorach and K. Elkon Neuropsychiatric lupus: getting beyond the barrier of the brain Lupus, June 1, 1996; 5(3): 173 - 174. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Kent, K. M. Kuntz, M. R. Patel, D. Kim, R. A. Klufas, A. D. Whittemore, J. F. Polak, J. J. Skillman, and R. R. Edelman Perioperative Imaging Strategies for Carotid Endarterectomy: An Analysis of Morbidity and Cost-effectiveness in Symptomatic Patients JAMA, September 20, 1995; 274(11): 888 - 893. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Reid, M. S. Lachs, and A. R. Feinstein Use of Methodological Standards in Diagnostic Test Research: Getting Better but Still Not Good JAMA, August 23, 1995; 274(8): 645 - 651. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
