Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 May 1994 | Volume 120 Issue 10 | Pages 821-826
Objective: To examine prospectively the risk for mortality among women who had ever used oral contraceptives compared with those who had never used oral contraceptives.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Nurses' Health Study.
Participants: 166 755 women aged 30 to 55 years in 1976, followed through 1988 (1.3 million person-years of follow-up).
Results: On the basis of 2879 deaths, we found no overall difference in mortality among women who had ever used oral contraceptives compared with women who had never used oral contraceptives; the relative risk for ever-users, adjusted for age, body mass index, and cigarette smoking was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.01). We observed no trend in risk for total mortality with increasing duration of past use of oral contraceptives. After adjusting for age, body mass index, and cigarette smoking, women who had used oral contraceptives for 10 or more years had a relative risk of 1.06 (CI, 0.83 to 1.35).
Conclusion: Use of oral contraceptives is safe; no evidence from this study indicates that long durations of oral contraceptive use adversely affect long-term risk for mortality.
Author and Article Information
From Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
ARTICLE
Oral Contraceptive Use and Mortality during 12 Years of Follow-Up: The Nurses' Health Study
![]()
For The Nurses' Health Study Research Group.
Requests for Reprints: Graham A. Colditz, Channing Laboratory, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5899.
Acknowledgments: The author thanks R. Doll, R. Peto, and M. Vessey for helpful input.
Grant Support: By grant CA 40936 from the National Institutes of Health. G. A. Colditz is supported by Faculty Research Award FRA 398 from the American Cancer Society.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. A. Colditz and D. M. Winn Criteria for the Evaluation of Large Cohort Studies: An Application to the Nurses' Health Study J Natl Cancer Inst, July 2, 2008; 100(13): 918 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C Hannaford, S. Selvaraj, A. M Elliott, V. Angus, L. Iversen, and A. J Lee Cancer risk among users of oral contraceptives: cohort data from the Royal College of General Practitioner's oral contraception study BMJ, September 29, 2007; 335(7621): 651 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hultgren, P. Olofsson, and E. Wahlberg Reproductive History in Women with Lower Limb Ischemia Angiology, July 1, 2004; 55(4): 373 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-S. Chan, J. Ray, E. K. Wai, S. Ginsburg, M. E. Hannah, P. N. Corey, and J. S. Ginsberg Risk of Stroke in Women Exposed to Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives: A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence Arch Intern Med, April 12, 2004; 164(7): 741 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Beral, C. Hermon, C. Kay, P. Hannaford, S. Darby, and G. Reeves Mortality associated with oral contraceptive use: 25 year follow up of cohort of 46 000 women from Royal College of General Practitioners' oral contraception study BMJ, January 9, 1999; 318(7176): 96 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ribstein, J.-M. Halimi, G. du Cailar, and A. Mimran Renal Characteristics and Effect of Angiotensin Suppression in Oral Contraceptive Users Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Casper, N. J. MacLusky, C. Vanin, and T. J. Brown Rationale for Estrogen With Interrupted Progestin as a New Low-Dose Hormonal Replacement Therapy Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 1996; 3(5): 225 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||