Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Wernick, R. M.
space
  arrow  Gaboury, C. L.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Reliability of Histologic Scoring for Lupus Nephritis: A Community-based Evaluation

right arrow Richard M. Wernick; David L. Smith; Donald C. Houghton; David S. Phillips; James L. Booth; Douglas N. Runckel; David S. Johnson; Kevin K. Brown; and Cynthia L. Gaboury

15 October 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 8 | Pages 805-811

Objective: To determine the reliability of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-modified semiquantitative histologic scoring system for lupus nephritis.

Design: Cross-sectional study, repeated after 8 to 9 months.

Setting: Four community hospitals and one university medical center.

Participants: Five pathologists, all experienced in reading renal biopsy specimens, assessed 25 specimens that had been obtained from patients with a clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and showed diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis.

Measurements: Biopsy specimens were scored independently and blindly by pathologists for components of nephritis chronicity and activity. Reliability was measured by percentage agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient or {kappa} statistic, and individual reader effect on the group arithmetic mean.

Results: As scored by the readers, the mean chronicity index score varied from 2.3 to 4.8 on a 12-point scale (P = 0.001) and the mean activity index score varied from 5.8 to 11.4 on a 24-point scale (P = 0.0001). Pairs of readers gave scores within 1 point for the chronicity index and within 2 points for the activity index in 50% of cases, and risk group assignments based on chronicity index (three strata) and activity index (two strata) were concordant in 59% and 76% of cases, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients for inter-reader agreement were 0.58 for the chronicity index (P < 0.01) and 0.52 for the activity index (P < 0.01). Intrareader agreement was uniformly higher than inter-reader agreement, but mean intraclass correlation coefficients exceeded 0.70 for only 1 of the 10 index components. Repeated readings yielded chronicity index scores that were more than 1 point discordant in 45% of cases and activity index scores that were more than 2 points discordant in 43% of cases. Risk group assignment changed on the basis of chronicity index and activity index in 36% and 21% of cases, respectively.

Conclusions: In a nonreferral setting, the NIH-modified scoring system for lupus nephritis is only moderately reproducible and, if used to prognosticate renal outcome, may result in erroneous predictions of risk for renal failure and response to therapy.

Author and Article Information
space

From Providence Medical Center, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oregon Health Sciences University, St. Vincent Medical Center, and Good Samaritan Hospital, Portland, Oregon.
Request for Reprints: Richard Wernick, MD, Providence Medical Center, 4805 Northeast Glisan Street, Portland, OR 97213.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Chris Siegenthaler for her expert assistance in manuscript preparation; P. Slopoko and Debra Miles for inspiration and support; and Howard A. Austin III for helpful discussion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Grootscholten, I. M. Bajema, S. Florquin, E. J. Steenbergen, C. J. Peutz-Kootstra, R. Goldschmeding, M. Bijl, E. C. Hagen, H. C. van Houwelingen, R. H. W. M. Derksen, et al.
Interobserver agreement of scoring of histopathological characteristics and classification of lupus nephritis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 223 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Goulvestre, C. Chereau, C. Nicco, L. Mouthon, B. Weill, and F. Batteux
A Mimic of p21WAF1/CIP1 Ameliorates Murine Lupus
J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 6959 - 6967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
M A Dooley, C Aranow, and E M Ginzler
Review of ACR renal criteria in systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, November 1, 2004; 13(11): 857 - 860.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
A.J. Howie, N. Turhan, and D. Adu
Powerful morphometric indicator of prognosis in lupus nephritis
QJM, June 1, 2003; 96(6): 411 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. C. Grimm, P. Nickerson, J. Gough, R. McKenna, E. Stern, J. Jeffery, and D. N. Rush
Computerized Image Analysis of Sirius Red-Stained Renal Allograft Biopsies as a Surrogate Marker to Predict Long-Term Allograft Function
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2003; 14(6): 1662 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
D T Boumpas and J E Balow
Outcome criteria for lupus nephritis trials: A critical overview
Lupus, November 1, 1998; 7(9): 622 - 629.
[Abstract] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Physicians.