Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
1 October 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 7 Part 1 | Pages 584-593
Objective: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of single daily dosing of amikacin and ceftriaxone with that of multiple daily dosing of amikacin and ceftazidime for febrile episodes in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia.
Design: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, multicenter trial.
Setting: Twenty-one tertiary care or university medical centers.
Patients: Six hundred seventy-seven patients with cancer and granulocytopenia (858 febrile episodes).
Interventions: Random assignment to empiric therapy with a single daily dose of amikacin (20 mg/kg) and ceftriaxone (adults, 30 mg/kg; children, 80 mg/kg) (24-hour group) or with multiple daily doses of amikacin (6.5 mg/kg every 8 hours) and ceftazidime (33 mg/kg every 8 hours) (8-hour group).
Measurements: Percentage response to each regimen and occurrence of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity.
Results: Single daily dosing of amikacin and ceftriaxone was as effective as multiple daily dosing of amikacin and ceftazidime (71% compared with 74%; difference, 3%;95% CI, 10% to 3%; P > 0.2). Equivalent responses also were noted for each category of infection. Median peak (30 minutes after a 60-minute infusion) serum concentrations of amikacin were higher in the 24-hour group than in the 8-hour group (45.6 compared with 21 µg/mL, P < 0.001), whereas trough (preinfusion) levels were lower (0.9 compared with 2 µg/mL, P < 0.001). Nephrotoxicity was 3% in the 24-hour group and 2% in the 8-hour group (difference, 1%; CI, 1% to 4%). Increases in serum creatinine, however, were delayed (P = 0.048) and smaller (P = 0.06) in the 24-hour group than in the 8-hour group and occurred almost exclusively after other nephrotoxic drugs were added. Audiometry was only done in 144 patients (21%). Ototoxicity was 9% in the 24-hour group and 7% in the 8-hour group (difference, 2%; CI, 7% to 11%; P > 0.2). Further infections developed in 15% and 12% of patients, respectively (difference, 3%; CI, 2% to 9%). The overall mortality rate was 11% in both treatment groups (difference, 0%; CI, 5% to 5%).
Conclusions: Single daily dosing of amikacin and ceftriaxone was as effective and no more toxic than multiple daily dosing of amikacin and ceftazidime for the empiric therapy of infection in patients with cancer and granulocytopenia.
Author and Article Information
Requests for Reprints: Thierry Calandra, MD, The Picower Institute for Medical Research, 350 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030.
ARTICLE
Efficacy and Toxicity of Single Daily Doses of Amikacin and Ceftriaxone versus Multiple Daily Doses of Amikacin and Ceftazidime for Infection in Patients with Cancer and Granulocytopenia
![]()
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Philippe Moreillon, MD, for critical review of the manuscript and Leslie Leonard, PhD, for helpful suggestions.
Grant Support: In part by Hoffmann-La Roche AG (Basel, Switzerland) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (Princeton, New Jersey). (The funding agencies did not participate in the collection of or in the analysis of the data. They were not involved in the writing of this article.)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Torfoss, E. A. Hoiby, J. M. Tangen, H. Holte, K. Bo, P. Meyer, K. Grottum, K. Weyde, G. F. Lauritzsen, B. Sandstad, et al. Tobramycin once versus three times daily, given with penicillin G, to febrile neutropenic cancer patients in Norway: a prospective, randomized, multicentre trial J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 27, 2007; (2007) dkm003v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Schafer, L. B. Hovde, and J. C. Rotschafer Consistent rates of kill of Staphylococcus aureus by gentamicin over a 6-fold clinical concentration range in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model (IVPDM) J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2006; 58(1): 108 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, N. D. Giotis, D. V. Baliatsa, and J. P. A. Ioannidis Extended-Interval Aminoglycoside Administration for Children: A Meta-analysis Pediatrics, July 1, 2004; 114(1): e111 - e118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sung, L. L. Dupuis, B. Bliss, A. Taddio, M. Abdolell, U. Allen, M. Rolland, A. Tong, T. Taylor, and J. Doyle Randomized Controlled Trial of Once- Versus Thrice-Daily Tobramycin in Febrile Neutropenic Children Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2003; 95(24): 1869 - 1877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Sanz, J. Lopez, J. J. Lahuerta, M. Rovira, M. Batlle, C. Perez, L. Vazquez, A. Julia, J. Palau, M. Gutierrez, et al. Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2002; 50(1): 79 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J Wiedemann, S. O Peters, T. Feyerabend, W. Solbach, U. Ullmann, and H.-J. Schmitt Year 2000 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in adult and pediatric neutropenic patients with unexplained fever from the Universities of Lubeck and Kiel Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, September 1, 1999; 5(3): 135 - 138. [PDF] |
||||