Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    Figures/Tables List  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Halevy, A.    Brody, B.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES

Brain Death: Reconciling Definitions, Criteria, and Tests

Amir Halevy and Baruch Brody

15 September 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 6 | Pages 519-525

Brain death has been discussed extensively for the last 25 years. Most investigators now believe that requiring death of the entire brain as the criterion for brain death in the Uniform Determination of Death Act and the standard clinical tests of brain death outlined in the Report of the Medical Consultants to the President's Commission have produced a satisfactory resolution of the issues surrounding the determination of death. However, we show that satisfying the standard medical tests does not guarantee that all brain functions have actually ceased and that there is tension between the legal criterion and the standard clinical tests. After considering and rejecting six possible reconciliations, we present an alternative approach that does not acknowledge any sharp dichotomy between life and death and incorporates the proposition that the questions of when care can be unilaterally discontinued, when organs can be harvested, and when a patient is ready for the services of an undertaker should be answered independent of any single account of death.

Author and Article Information

From Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Requests for Reprints: Amir Halevy, MD, General Medicine Section, Ben Taub General Hospital, 1504 Taub Loop, Houston, TX 77030.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Robert Arnold, MD, and Stuart Youngner, MD, for advice and support.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Macdonald, S. Liben, F. A. Carnevale, and S. R. Cohen Signs of life and signs of death: brain death and other mixed messages at the end of life J Child Health Care, June 1, 2008; 12(2): 92 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. D. Shemie REPLY Can J Anesth, October 1, 2006; 53(10): 1061 - 1062. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Joffe and N. Anton Brain Death: Understanding of the Conceptual Basis by Pediatric Intensivists in Canada Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, July 1, 2006; 160(7): 747 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Baron, S. D. Shemie, J. Teitelbaum, and C. J. Doig Brief review: History, concept and controversies in the neurological determination of death: [Revue sommaire : histoire, concept et discussion de la determination neurologique de la mort]. Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6): 602 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. J. Daly End-of-Life Decision Making, Organ Donation, and Critical Care Nurses Crit. Care Nurse, April 1, 2006; 26(2): 78 - 86. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Bernat The Whole-Brain Concept of Death Remains Optimum Public Policy J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2006; 34(1): 35 - 43. [PDF]

				C. J. Doig and E. Burgess Brain death: resolving inconsistencies in the ethical declaration of death: [La mort cerebrale : resoudre les contradictions de la declaration ethique de la mort] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2003; 50(7): 725 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Elliot Brain death Trauma, January 1, 2003; 5(1): 23 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. J. Leavitt Educating Nurses for Their Future Role in Bioethics Nursing Ethics, March 1, 1996; 3(1): 39 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]