Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    Figures/Tables List  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Frame, P. S.    Patterson, C.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

REVIEW

Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Men Ages 60 to 80 Years: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Paul S. Frame; Dennis G. Fryback; and Christopher Patterson

1 September 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 5 | Pages 411-416

Purpose: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening by physical examination or abdominal ultrasonography for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 60 to 80 years.

Data Sources: A systematic review of the pertinent literature by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination, augmented by an additional computerized search (MEDLINE) and references identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles. Several experts reviewed the data for completeness.

Study Selection: Published English-language studies that present data relevant to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Data Extraction: Several reviewers determined a range of data and the most probable value for each parameter.

Data Synthesis: A computer spreadsheet model was constructed to simulate the costs and effectiveness of various screening protocols in a cohort of 10 000 men during a period of 20 years. The primary cost-effectiveness measure computed was incremental present-value dollar expenditures for screening and treatment per incremental present-value life-year saved by the screening program. Using the "most probable" values for the simulation parameters, a single screening procedure of abdominal palpation followed by abdominal ultrasound scan for patients with positive screening results is estimated to gain 20 life-years at a cost of $28 741 per life-year. A single ultrasound screen gains 57 life-years at a cost of $41 550 per life-year. A repeated ultrasound screen after 5 years gains 1 additional life-year at a cost of $906 769.

Conclusions: A single screen for AAA by abdominal palpation in men from age 60 to 80 years might be considered cost-effective but of small benefit. A single screen with ultrasonography is at the high end of the cost-per-life-year range that might be considered cost-effective and also is of modest benefit. Repeated screening is not cost-effective.

Author and Article Information

From the Tri-County Family Medicine Program, Dansville, New York; the Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; the University of Wisconsin-Madison Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Requests for Reprints: Paul S. Frame, MD, Tri-County Family Medicine, Box 112 Park Avenue, Cohocton, NY 14826.
Grant Support: In part by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (HSO6283) and in part by the Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Madison Department of Veterans Affairs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. W. Rooke Controversies in vascular screening art versus science Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2007; 12(3): 235 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. S Frame Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm BMJ, July 24, 2004; 329(7459): E311 - E312. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Goyen, C. U. Herborn, K. Kroger, T. C. Lauenstein, J. F. Debatin, and S. G. Ruehm Detection of Atherosclerosis: Systemic Imaging for Systemic Disease with Whole-Body Three-dimensional MR Angiography-- Initial Experience Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 277 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial BMJ, November 16, 2002; 325(7373): 1135 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Lederle, G. R. Johnson, S. E. Wilson, F. N. Littooy, W. C. Krupski, D. Bandyk, C. W. Acher, E. P. Chute, R. J. Hye, I. L. Gordon, et al. Yield of Repeated Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After a 4-Year Interval Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2000; 160(8): 1117 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. A. Fink, F. A. Lederle, C. S. Roth, C. A. Bowles, D. B. Nelson, and M. A. Haas The Accuracy of Physical Examination to Detect Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Arch Intern Med, March 27, 2000; 160(6): 833 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Merenstein, H. Rabinowitz, and D. Z. Louis Health Care Plan Decisions Regarding Preventive Services Arch Fam Med, July 1, 1999; 8(4): 354 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Barratt, L. Irwig, P. Glasziou, R. G. Cumming, A. Raffle, N. Hicks, J. A. M. Gray, G. H. Guyatt, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XVII. How to Use Guidelines and Recommendations About Screening JAMA, June 2, 1999; 281(21): 2029 - 2034. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. A. Lederle and D. L. Simel Does This Patient Have Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm? JAMA, January 6, 1999; 281(1): 77 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. P. Derdeyn and W. J. Powers Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 1944 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. S. Hans and H. J. Zeskind Routine Use of Limited Abdominal Aortography With Digital Subtraction Carotid and Cerebral Angiography Stroke, July 1, 1995; 26(7): 1221 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text]