Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 July 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 2 | Pages 129-135
Objectives: To describe physical examination and cancer prevention services provided by primary care physicians in response to the request for a "checkup" by an asymptomatic 55-year-old woman seeking to establish ongoing care; to assess the effects of two interventions (education and office organization) intended to improve these services; and to assess the feasibility of using "standardized" patients to evaluate physician responses to such a request.
Setting: Northern New England.
Participants: Fifty-nine primary care physicians who were accepting new patients and were participating in a study of early detection and prevention of cancer.
Design: Cross sectional; observations of patient visits.
Interventions: Actresses trained to portray a specific patient role ("standardized" or "simulated" patients) visited each physician once. Physicians were blinded to the simulated patients' true identities.
Measurements: Actresses reported the components of the general physical examination and the cancer-related "checkup". Most interactions were audiotaped.
Results: Fourteen physical examination components were measured, ranging from assessment of vibratory sense (5%) to measurement of blood pressure (98%). Provision of 10 services recommended by the National Cancer Institute to standardized patients included 16% being advised to reduce dietary fat; 53% to do monthly breast self-examination; 74% to quit smoking; and 89% to obtain a mammogram. Physicians spent from 5 to 60 minutes with the patients. Two physicians did not charge, whereas others charged from $24 to $108. Study group assignment was not associated with statistical differences in provider performance. Two standardized patients (3%) were detected by physicians. Audiotapes were used to verify the actresses' ability to replicate their scenario (consistently repeat their performance) and to verify physician performance.
Conclusions: Physician responses to an identical patient request varied widely in terms of time spent with the patient, the services provided, and the cost of the visit. Using standardized patients is a feasible method for assessing physician performance of the periodic health examination while controlling for case mix.
Author and Article Information
From the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire; the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galvaston, Texas.
ACADEMIA AND CLINIC
The Periodic Health Examination Provided to Asymptomatic Older Women: An Assessment Using Standardized Patients
![]()
Requests for Reprints: Patricia A. Carney, RN, MS, Department of Community Health Care Systems, SM-24, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Maggie Moore-West, PhD, for her help in the conceptualization of this project; physicians of the Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information Network who assisted with developing the standardized patient scenario; and Susanna Reed for manuscript preparation.
Grant Support: Supported by grants CA46075, CA23108, and CA531521 from the National Cancer Institute.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Boutain and J. Hitti Orienting multiple interviewers: the use of an interview orientation and standardized interview. Qual Health Res, November 1, 2006; 16(9): 1302 - 1309. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-D. BEAULIEU, M. RIVARD, E. HUDON, D. SAUCIER, M. REMONDIN, and R. FAVREAU Using standardized patients to measure professional performance of physicians Int. J. Qual. Health Care, May 1, 2003; 15(3): 251 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. H. Yarnall, K. I. Pollak, T. Ostbye, K. M. Krause, and J. L. Michener Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention? Am J Public Health, April 1, 2003; 93(4): 635 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Luck and J. W Peabody Using standardised patients to measure physicians' practice: validation study using audio recordings BMJ, September 28, 2002; 325(7366): 679 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Grant, R. Nicholas, L. Moore, and C. Salisbury An observational study comparing quality of care in walk-in centres with general practice and NHS Direct using standardised patients BMJ, June 29, 2002; 324(7353): 1556 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Epstein and E. M. Hundert Defining and Assessing Professional Competence JAMA, January 9, 2002; 287(2): 226 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Peabody, J. Luck, P. Glassman, T. R. Dresselhaus, and M. Lee Comparison of Vignettes, Standardized Patients, and Chart Abstraction: A Prospective Validation Study of 3 Methods for Measuring Quality JAMA, April 5, 2000; 283(13): 1715 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Curtis, M. Mintzer, D. Morrell, J. C. Resnick, S. Hendrix, and B. F. Qaqish Characteristics and Quality of Papanicolaou Smears Obtained by Primary Care Clinicians Using a Single Commercial Laboratory Arch Fam Med, September 1, 1999; 8(5): 407 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Donohoe Comparing Generalist and Specialty Care: Discrepancies, Deficiencies, and Excesses Arch Intern Med, August 10, 1998; 158(15): 1596 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Cardozo, J. Steinberg, M. B. Lepczyk, L. Binns-Emerick, Y. Cardozo, and A. N. F. Aranha Improving Preventive Health Care in a Medical Resident Practice Arch Intern Med, February 9, 1998; 158(3): 261 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||