Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 December 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 12 | Pages 1155-1160
Objective: To determine the effect of adding intravenous theophylline (administered as aminophylline) to nebulizations of albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone in adults hospitalized for acute asthma.
Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.
Setting: Inpatient service of a tertiary-care, university teaching hospital.
Patients: 21 adults (22 to 48 years old)10 in the aminophylline group and 11 in the placebo group.
Interventions: Nebulized albuterol, 2.5 or 5.0 mg every 0.5 to 4 hours; intravenous methylprednisolone, 60 mg every 6 hours; and either individualized doses of aminophylline or placebo for 48 hours.
Measurements: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), the number of "as needed" albuterol nebulizations and total dose, asthma symptom scores, and adverse effects.
Results: At admission from the emergency department, the mean ±SD baseline FEV1 was 49% ± 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 43% ± 13% of the predicted value in the placebo group. The improvement in FEV1 at 3 hours was greater in the aminophylline group (29% ± 23% compared with 10% ± 10% in the placebo group; mean difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 3 to 35 percentage points; P = 0.023). At 48 hours, FEV1 was 75% ± 19% of the predicted value in the aminophylline group and 58% ± 15% of the predicted value in the placebo group (mean difference, 17 percentage points; CI, 0.2 to 34.8 percentage points; P = 0.048). Aminophylline-treated patients required fewer nebulizations of albuterol (10.3 ± 3.8 compared with 16.4 ± 5.3; mean difference, 6.1;CI, 10.3 to 1.8)and less total dosage (34 ± 16 mg compared with 70 ± 34 mg; mean difference, 36 mg; CI, 60.6 to 11.3 mg P = 0.02). No statistical differences were observed in asthma symptom scores or frequency of adverse effects.
Conclusions: Individualized doses of intravenous theophylline added to frequent nebulizations of albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone appear to benefit adults admitted to the hospital with acute asthma and are well tolerated when serum concentrations are maintained in the therapeutic range.
Author and Article Information
From the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
ARTICLE
Does Aminophylline Benefit Adults Admitted to the Hospital for an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma?
![]()
Requests for Reprints: Leslie Hendeles, PharmD, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the internal medicine housestaff at the University of Florida and the respiratory therapy department staff and the fifth floor nursing staff of Shands Hospital for their assistance; Drs. Bill Brandes and Ted Carter for their assistance with the study protocol; and Joy Mitchell for processing and editing the typescript.
Grant Support: In part by the University of Florida Foundation Pulmonary Research and Education Fund and the American Lung Association (Dr. Huang). AccuLevel kits for measurement of theophylline concentrations were provided by Syntex Medical Diagnostics.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Ream, L. L. Loftis, G. M. Albers, B. A. Becker, R. E. Lynch, and R. B. Mink Efficacy of IV Theophylline in Children With Severe Status Asthmaticus Chest, May 1, 2001; 119(5): 1480 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Okada, S. Teramoto, and R. Matsuoka Recovery from Theophylline Toxicity by Continuous Hemodialysis with Filtration Ann Intern Med, December 5, 2000; 133(11): 922 - 922. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.P. Hart Should aminophylline be abandoned in the treatment of acute asthma in adults? QJM, November 1, 2000; 93(11): 761 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Management of patients with asthma in the emergency department and in hospital Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 1999; 161(90111): s53 - 59. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yung and M. South Randomised controlled trial of aminophylline for severe acute asthma Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 1998; 79(5): 405 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Pesce, M. Rashkin, and U. Kotagal Standards of laboratory practice: theophylline and caffeine monitoring Clin. Chem., May 1, 1998; 44(5): 1124 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Everett Alternatives to Standard Status Asthmaticus Therapy Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 1997; 10(3): 186 - 199. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Weinberger and L. Hendeles Theophylline in Asthma N. Engl. J. Med., May 23, 1996; 334(21): 1380 - 1388. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
DOES AMINOPHYLLINE BENEFIT HOSPITALIZED ASTHMA PATIENTS? Journal Watch (General), December 31, 1993; 1993(1231): 7 - 7. [Full Text] |
||||