Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Strain, E. C.
space
  arrow  Bigelow, G. E.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Dose-Response Effects of Methadone in the Treatment of Opioid Dependence

right arrow Eric C. Strain, MD; Maxine L. Stitzer, PhD; Ira A. Liebson, MD; and George E. Bigelow, PhD

1 July 1993 | Volume 119 Issue 1 | Pages 23-27

Objective: To compare the dose effectiveness of low to moderate doses of methadone in a sample of a contemporary population of opioid abusers, because the optimal dosing of methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence remains an issue.

Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: A methadone treatment research clinic.

Patients: Participants (n = 247) were opioid-dependent patients with a high rate of cocaine use.

Intervention: All participants were initially treated with active methadone for a minimum of 5 weeks and then received 15 weeks of stable dosing at 50, 20, or 0 mg per day. Individual counseling and group therapy were included.

Measurements: Treatment retention and illicit drug use as determined by intensive urine monitoring.

Results: Retention was better for patients who remained on active medication. By treatment week 20, retention was 52.4% for the 50-mg, 41.5% for the 20-mg, and 21.0% for the 0-mg group (50 versus 0 and 20 versus 0, P < 0.05; 50 versus 20, P > 0.05). Only the 50-mg treatment group had a reduced rate of opioid-positive urine samples (56.4% versus 67.6% and 73.6% for the 20-mg and 0-mg groups, respectively; P < 0.05) and cocaine-positive urine samples (52.6% versus 62.4% and 67.1% for the 20- and 0-mg groups, respectively; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: There is a dose-response effect for methadone treatment. Doses as low as 20 mg may improve retention but are inadequate for suppressing illicit drug use.

Author and Article Information
space

From Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Requests for Reprints: Eric C. Strain, MD, The Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Francis Scott Key Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21224.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the clinic and research staff for their assistance in the execution of this study.
Grant Support: By USPHS grant R01-DA05792.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. F. Wedam, G. E. Bigelow, R. E. Johnson, P. A. Nuzzo, and M. C. P. Haigney
QT-Interval Effects of Methadone, Levomethadyl, and Buprenorphine in a Randomized Trial
Arch Intern Med, December 10, 2007; 167(22): 2469 - 2475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
F. J. Vocci, J. Acri, and A. Elkashef
Medication Development for Addictive Disorders: The State of the Science
Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 2005; 162(8): 1432 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. S. Schottenfeld, M. C. Chawarski, J. R. Pakes, M. V. Pantalon, K. M. Carroll, and T. R. Kosten
Methadone Versus Buprenorphine With Contingency Management or Performance Feedback for Cocaine and Opioid Dependence
Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 162(2): 340 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
R Brown, C Kraus, M Fleming, and S Reddy
Methadone: applied pharmacology and use as adjunctive treatment in chronic pain
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2004; 80(949): 654 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. J. Krantz and P. S. Mehler
Treating Opioid Dependence: Growing Implications for Primary Care
Arch Intern Med, February 9, 2004; 164(3): 277 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Ment. HealthHome page
N. Clark
High dose buprenorphine may be an effective interim treatment for long term heroin users waiting for drug-assisted rehabilitation
Evid. Based Ment. Health, February 1, 2003; 6(1): 30 - 30.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. E. Johnson, M. A. Chutuape, E. C. Strain, S. L. Walsh, M. L. Stitzer, and G. E. Bigelow
A Comparison of Levomethadyl Acetate, Buprenorphine, and Methadone for Opioid Dependence
N. Engl. J. Med., November 2, 2000; 343(18): 1290 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. G. O'Connor and D. A. Fiellin
Pharmacologic Treatment of Heroin-Dependent Patients
Ann Intern Med, July 4, 2000; 133(1): 40 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
K. L. Preston, A. Umbricht, and D. H. Epstein
Methadone Dose Increase and Abstinence Reinforcement for Treatment of Continued Heroin Use During Methadone Maintenance
Arch Gen Psychiatry, April 1, 2000; 57(4): 395 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. C. Strain, G. E. Bigelow, I. A. Liebson, and M. L. Stitzer
Moderate- vs High-Dose Methadone in the Treatment of Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, March 17, 1999; 281(11): 1000 - 1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M Farrell, J Ward, R Mattick, W Hall, G V Stimson, D des Jarlais, M Gossop, and J Strang
Fortnightly Review: Methadone maintenance treatment in opiate dependence: a review
BMJ, October 15, 1994; 309(6960): 997 - 1001.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
METHADONE DOSING IN OPIOID DEPENDENCE
Journal Watch (General), July 9, 1993; 1993(709): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Physicians.