Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 January 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 1 | Pages 25-30
Objective: To re-evaluate the accuracy of impedance plethysmography (IPG) for the detection of proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT).
Patients: A total of 384 of 390 consecutive outpatients referred with their first episode of clinically suspected DVT.
Setting: University-based tertiary care medical center associated with a cancer clinic.
Design: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients whose data were recorded and stored prospectively on a computerized data base over a 22-month period.
Measurements: Patients were evaluated by a physician and underwent IPG testing. Patients with abnormal IPG tests and those with normal IPG results in whom there was a high clinical suspicion of DVT or in whom follow-up IPG testing was not feasible were referred for venography. Venography and IPG results were interpreted by a panel of independent observers. Two models of the IPG instrument were used (Codman 200 and Electrodiagnostic Instruments 800).
Results: Venography (or compression ultrasound) was done in 57 patients with an abnormal IPG test and in 85 patients with normal IPG results. Impedance plethysmography was abnormal in only 37 of 56 patients with confirmed proximal-vein thrombosis (sensitivity, 66%; 95% CI, 52% to 78%). Of the 57 patients with an abnormal IPG result, 37 had DVT (positive predictive value, 65%). The sensitivity for the detection of proximal DVT did not differ between the IPG 200 and 800 instruments (sensitivity, 63% and 71%, respectively; P > 0.2). Of the 19 proximal-vein thrombi not detected by IPG, 12 (63%) were occlusive and 11 (58%) involved at least the popliteal and superficial femoral veins.
Conclusions: At our center, IPG has a far lower sensitivity for proximal-vein thrombosis than has been previously reported for symptomatic outpatients. The reason for this low sensitivity is unclear. Our findings indicate that centers using IPG as the initial diagnostic test for suspected DVT should be aware of this potential problem and should consider re-evaluating the sensitivity of their IPG machines by performing venography in a cohort of their patients with normal test results.
Author and Article Information
From Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
ARTICLE
Limitations of Impedance Plethysmography in the Diagnosis of Clinically Suspected Deep-Vein Thrombosis
![]()
Requests for Reprints: David Anderson, MD, Rm 117A, West Wing, Mackenzie Building, Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 148.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Mrs. D. Redshaw, Mrs. J. Cole, Mrs. S. Smale, and Mrs. L. Harrison for their enthusiastic assistance.
Grant Support: Dr. Anderson is the recipient of a fellowship from the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation, and Dr. Wells is the recipient of a McLaughlin Fellowship from the University of Ottawa.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. K. Zierler Ultrasonography and Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12_suppl_1): I-9 - I-14. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dhote, M. Pellicer-Coeuret, C. Belouet-Moreau, B. Christoforov, and G. Vidal-Trecan Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients: Prophylaxis With Low-Weight Heparin in a University Hospital and Prevalence of Thromboembolic Events Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 2001; 7(1): 16 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Tapson The Diagnostic Approach to Acute Venous Thromboembolism . Clinical Practice Guideline Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 1043 - 1066. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Fraser and D. R. Anderson Deep Venous Thrombosis: Recent Advances and Optimal Investigation with US Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 9 - 24. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Dixon, M. A. Ricci, J. G. Reid, C. Possidente, S. J. Incavo, and J. G. Howe Is Impedance Plethysmography a Safe Test After Total Joint Replacement? Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 1998; 32(3): 255 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Anand, P. S. Wells, D. Hunt, P. Brill-Edwards, D. Cook, and J. S. Ginsberg Does This Patient Have Deep Vein Thrombosis? JAMA, April 8, 1998; 279(14): 1094 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kalodiki and A. N. Nicolaides Air Plethysmography for the Detection of Acute DVT: New Criteria Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 1997; 31(2): 123 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hirsh and J. Hoak Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Council on Thrombosis (in Consultation With the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association Circulation, June 15, 1996; 93(12): 2212 - 2245. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bona, A. Hickey, L. Greenwald, E. Sullivan, P. Livadiotis, O. Johnson, A. Kulak, S. Wajcs, and K. Vose Low Risk of Subsequent Deep-Venous Thrombosis in Patients with a Negative Venous Duplex Scan Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 1996; 2(1): 30 - 34. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Wells, P. Brill-Edwards, P. Stevens, A. Panju, A. Patel, J. Douketis, M. P. Massicotte, J. Hirsh, J. I. Weitz, C. Kearon, et al. A Novel and Rapid Whole-Blood Assay for D-Dimer in Patients With Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis Circulation, April 15, 1995; 91(8): 2184 - 2187. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Weinmann and E. W. Salzman Deep-Vein Thrombosis N. Engl. J. Med., December 15, 1994; 331(24): 1630 - 1641. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cogo, P. Prandoni, S. Villalta, P. Polistena, E. Bernardi, P. Simioni, M. Vigo, L. Benedetti, and A. Girolami Changing Features of Proximal Vein Thrombosis Over Time Angiology, May 1, 1994; 45(5): 377 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Moser, P. F. Fedullo, H. Heijboer, H. R. Buller, and J. W. ten Cate The Diagnosis of Deep-Vein Thrombosis N. Engl. J. Med., March 24, 1994; 330(12): 863 - 864. [Full Text] |
||||