Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Anderson, D. R.
space
  arrow  Hirsh, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Limitations of Impedance Plethysmography in the Diagnosis of Clinically Suspected Deep-Vein Thrombosis

right arrow David R. Anderson, MD; Anthonie W.A. Lensing, MD, PhD; Philip S. Wells, MD; Mark N. Levine, MD, MSc; Jeffrey I. Weitz, MD; and Jack Hirsh, MD

1 January 1993 | Volume 118 Issue 1 | Pages 25-30

Objective: To re-evaluate the accuracy of impedance plethysmography (IPG) for the detection of proximal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT).

Patients: A total of 384 of 390 consecutive outpatients referred with their first episode of clinically suspected DVT.

Setting: University-based tertiary care medical center associated with a cancer clinic.

Design: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients whose data were recorded and stored prospectively on a computerized data base over a 22-month period.

Measurements: Patients were evaluated by a physician and underwent IPG testing. Patients with abnormal IPG tests and those with normal IPG results in whom there was a high clinical suspicion of DVT or in whom follow-up IPG testing was not feasible were referred for venography. Venography and IPG results were interpreted by a panel of independent observers. Two models of the IPG instrument were used (Codman 200 and Electrodiagnostic Instruments 800).

Results: Venography (or compression ultrasound) was done in 57 patients with an abnormal IPG test and in 85 patients with normal IPG results. Impedance plethysmography was abnormal in only 37 of 56 patients with confirmed proximal-vein thrombosis (sensitivity, 66%; 95% CI, 52% to 78%). Of the 57 patients with an abnormal IPG result, 37 had DVT (positive predictive value, 65%). The sensitivity for the detection of proximal DVT did not differ between the IPG 200 and 800 instruments (sensitivity, 63% and 71%, respectively; P > 0.2). Of the 19 proximal-vein thrombi not detected by IPG, 12 (63%) were occlusive and 11 (58%) involved at least the popliteal and superficial femoral veins.

Conclusions: At our center, IPG has a far lower sensitivity for proximal-vein thrombosis than has been previously reported for symptomatic outpatients. The reason for this low sensitivity is unclear. Our findings indicate that centers using IPG as the initial diagnostic test for suspected DVT should be aware of this potential problem and should consider re-evaluating the sensitivity of their IPG machines by performing venography in a cohort of their patients with normal test results.

Author and Article Information
space

From Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Requests for Reprints: David Anderson, MD, Rm 117A, West Wing, Mackenzie Building, Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 148.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Mrs. D. Redshaw, Mrs. J. Cole, Mrs. S. Smale, and Mrs. L. Harrison for their enthusiastic assistance.
Grant Support: Dr. Anderson is the recipient of a fellowship from the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation, and Dr. Wells is the recipient of a McLaughlin Fellowship from the University of Ottawa.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. K. Zierler
Ultrasonography and Diagnosis of Venous Thromboembolism
Circulation, March 30, 2004; 109(12_suppl_1): I-9 - I-14.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
R. Dhote, M. Pellicer-Coeuret, C. Belouet-Moreau, B. Christoforov, and G. Vidal-Trecan
Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients: Prophylaxis With Low-Weight Heparin in a University Hospital and Prevalence of Thromboembolic Events
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 2001; 7(1): 16 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. Tapson
The Diagnostic Approach to Acute Venous Thromboembolism . Clinical Practice Guideline
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 1043 - 1066.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. D. Fraser and D. R. Anderson
Deep Venous Thrombosis: Recent Advances and Optimal Investigation with US
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 9 - 24.
[Full Text]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
D. J. Dixon, M. A. Ricci, J. G. Reid, C. Possidente, S. J. Incavo, and J. G. Howe
Is Impedance Plethysmography a Safe Test After Total Joint Replacement?
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, May 1, 1998; 32(3): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. S. Anand, P. S. Wells, D. Hunt, P. Brill-Edwards, D. Cook, and J. S. Ginsberg
Does This Patient Have Deep Vein Thrombosis?
JAMA, April 8, 1998; 279(14): 1094 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
E. Kalodiki and A. N. Nicolaides
Air Plethysmography for the Detection of Acute DVT: New Criteria
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 1997; 31(2): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Hirsh and J. Hoak
Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Council on Thrombosis (in Consultation With the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association
Circulation, June 15, 1996; 93(12): 2212 - 2245.
[Full Text]


Home page
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOSTHome page
R. Bona, A. Hickey, L. Greenwald, E. Sullivan, P. Livadiotis, O. Johnson, A. Kulak, S. Wajcs, and K. Vose
Low Risk of Subsequent Deep-Venous Thrombosis in Patients with a Negative Venous Duplex Scan
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, January 1, 1996; 2(1): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. S. Wells, P. Brill-Edwards, P. Stevens, A. Panju, A. Patel, J. Douketis, M. P. Massicotte, J. Hirsh, J. I. Weitz, C. Kearon, et al.
A Novel and Rapid Whole-Blood Assay for D-Dimer in Patients With Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis
Circulation, April 15, 1995; 91(8): 2184 - 2187.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. E. Weinmann and E. W. Salzman
Deep-Vein Thrombosis
N. Engl. J. Med., December 15, 1994; 331(24): 1630 - 1641.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. Cogo, P. Prandoni, S. Villalta, P. Polistena, E. Bernardi, P. Simioni, M. Vigo, L. Benedetti, and A. Girolami
Changing Features of Proximal Vein Thrombosis Over Time
Angiology, May 1, 1994; 45(5): 377 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. M. Moser, P. F. Fedullo, H. Heijboer, H. R. Buller, and J. W. ten Cate
The Diagnosis of Deep-Vein Thrombosis
N. Engl. J. Med., March 24, 1994; 330(12): 863 - 864.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1993 by the American College of Physicians.